677

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 34 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] [email protected] 469 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The only mistake Billy made is giving anything to AdBlock Plus, the people who have sided WITH the ads, instead of uBlock Origin, the true MVPs of the ad blocking world. I guess uBlock doesn't accept donations unfortunately, but still, ABP is shady and I would not support them.

[-] [email protected] 93 points 1 year ago

Some of the block list maintainer do accept donations, if I recall.

[-] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago

I did a quick search and they don't make it easy. Peter Lowe's ad and tracking server blocklist is the only one I found. EasyList doesn't seem to have a donation link, nor Dan Pollock at someonewhocares.org. Also worth noting that UBO doesn't take donations. You could always subscribe to AdGuard, but that's mixed.

[+] [email protected] 159 points 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

[deleted]

[-] [email protected] 191 points 1 year ago

uBlock Origin*

[+] [email protected] -61 points 1 year ago

Same thing

Ublock is jdut shorter

[-] [email protected] 141 points 1 year ago

It very much is not the same thing

[-] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago

Oh, my bad

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It's cool, you're sleepy. We get it

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Okie :3

[-] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago

They aren’t. From a comment on https://www.reddit.com/r/ublock/comments/32mos6/ublock_vs_ublock_origin/ by u/tehdang:

For people who have stumbled into this thread while googling "ublock vs origin". Take a look at this link:

http://tuxdiary.com/2015/06/14/ublock-origin/

"Chris AlJoudi [current owner of uBlock] is under fire on Reddit due to several actions in recent past:

In a Wikipedia edit for uBlock, Chris removed all credits to Raymond [Hill, original author and owner of uBlock Origin] and added his name without any mention of the original author’s contribution.

Chris pledged a donation with overblown details on expenses like $25 per week for web hosting.

The activities of Chris since he took over the project are more business and advertisement oriented than development driven."

So I would recommend that you go with uBlock Origin and not uBlock. I hope this helps!

Edit: Also got this bit of information from here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/chrome/comments/32ory7/ublock_is_back_under_a_new_name/

TL;DR:

gorhill [Raymond Hill] got tired of dozens of "my facebook isnt working plz help" issues.

he handed the repository to chrismatic [Chris Aljioudi] while maintaining control of the extension in the Chrome webstore (by forking chrismatic's version back to himself).

chrismatic promptly added donate buttons and a "made with love by Chris" note.

gorhill took exception to this and asked chrismatic to change the name so people didn't confuse uBlock (the original, now called uBlock Origin) and uBlock (chrismatic's version).

Google took down gorhill's extension. Apparently this was because of the naming issue (since technically chrismatic has control of the repo).

gorhill renamed and rebranded his version of ublock to uBlock Origin.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Some people are so greedy smh

I just love how Raymond thinks about donations. "Money is not my motivation." And forwards to the people that contribute the most by provoding filter lists for everyone!

[-] [email protected] 123 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ad block is NOT piracy. And use Ublock Origin.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

uBlock Origin is also not piracy, but it is the real way to block

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Technically we are just keeping the waters clean of unusable, useless garbage. The ad corps are invading our waters.

[-] [email protected] 91 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I prefer unlock origin but he got the spirit

[-] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago

Yeah, if your going to support something support the open source project that doesnt advertise

[-] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

If you buy premium, do it to support the creators you watch, fuck doing it just for no ads.

[+] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[deleted]

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Yeah just cutout the middle man and support creators directly

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I lack the money to buy something from every creator I watch (literally over 100 channels subbed to), and premium genuinely does pay them more than ads. Sure, like half is going to google, but it's definitely the easier way to support the creators that does actually pay them.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Nebula might be the answer for you. A low annual fee means every video you watch gives a portion of that fee to the artist.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

The majority of the people i subscribe to aren't on Nebula, so that wont help a whole lot.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Why not?

If i am going to be supporting creators I think YT premium would be the way I would do it.

YouTube Premium is super helpful in distributing money automatically to creators without needing to think about it.

I have many many creators I tune in and out of I am not going to be trying to manage all of their patreons and trying to manage all of that.

Honestly I have to much crap already, 99% of merch is just garbage IMO that i will never use and don't need.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If you buy premium your doing both.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, but if I was only doing it for no ads, I'd rather just use ad block. Instead, I'm doing to to support the creators I watch in the laziest way possible, because I'm letting Google do all the work to spread the money out.