all 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 90 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Lena Cena is pretty funny but these people sound insufferable.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (18 children)
  • [–] 126 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Forsén stated in the 2019 documentary film Losing Lena, "I retired from modeling a long time ago. It's time I retired from tech, too... Let's commit to losing me.

    From Wikipedia

    She was a paid model, so I don't consider the usage unethical based on that. But I like this comment from a journal:

    In today's age of high-resolution digital image technology, it seems difficult to argue that a 512 × 512 image produced with a 1970s-era analog scanner is the best we have to offer as an image quality test standard".

    Lmao, they do have a point though!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    She has since asked for the image to no longer be used, "I retired from modeling a long time ago. It's time I retired from tech, too. We can make a simple change today that creates a lasting change for tomorrow. Let's commit to losing me."

    https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/losing-lena-removing-one-image-to-make-millions-of-women-feel-welcome-300960513.html

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] [S] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (12 children)
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Yeah, those woke culture warriors at the ... IEEE ... distracting us from ... Something... by asking academic researchers to ... Refrain from using a specific cropped pornographic image that the model has asked people to stop using.

    Those bastards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] [S] -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I mean, the IEEE didn't really make that big of a deal about it. An email to members informing them of an update to https://magazines.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/create-your-ieee-magazine-article/article-submission-requirements/ hardly feels like hype. I think it's about the minimal fuss you can make while still allowing people to know about the change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] [S] -7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I mean, I'd agree that it's not really too interesting of a thing to report on, but... It just doesn't seem weird to me that they didn't talk about something, and then after something happened with it they did for a minute, and then they stopped again. Nine articles from a month ago, when they updated the policy, and none since doesn't scream "a ton" or "culture war" to me.

    And what is the act of class warfare being done here, in your view? What's the narrative or agenda being pushed?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    I think you're reading way to much into things.
    Nine articles is not a "wave" or "trending", and if you had read any of them they're essentially non-sensational, explain that the image is notable because of its role in the development of digital imagery, why they're moving away, and why that's for the best.

    Jumping from a small number of neutral articles in either explicitly technical or technology adjacent sources to a "wave" of sensationalist agitation targeting older dissatisfied white men is, frankly, really fucking weird.

    With your "I don't work in this field, why do I need to hear about this" it really feels like your saying anything you don't care about shouldn't be reported on, and if it is reported on, it's because someone must have an ulterior motive.
    It's been a near standard test image for decades. Deprecating it is a model case for a low stakes info piece if you're a tech publication. News you're not interested in isn't automatically cultural warfare.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Forsén redid the shoot some 50 years later, producing a (worksafe) image of a grandmotherly woman wearing a hat and smiling. Perhaps using this updated image would be a reasonable compromise?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    If they put the model in a tutu, they could've made the Lena Cena Ballerina.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    What the hell is sex-positive?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    They tested positive for sex, unlike you, probably.

    Real answer: Sex positivity is an attitude towards human sexuality that regards all consensual sexual activities as fundamentally healthy and pleasurable, encouraging sexual pleasure and experimentation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    If this is real, anybody got an arxiv link?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I can't unsee him.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Whoa, a person with 50% opacity?! Diffusion models are falling off.

  • source