top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 72 points 2 years ago* (13 children)

Users are freaking out

Oh noo how will I manage without my daily cringe worthy bullshit videos mixed with ads

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I think it's ironic this is posted here on Lemmy, which is what it is today mainly thanks to users of another service freaking out over how they will manage without their API access to bullshit aggregated content mixed with astroturfing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Most of the people who used the 3rd party apps weren't people who just doom scrolled shit that was fed to them. Most of them had all the default shit blocked or unsubed. It was all niche stuff the majority was subed to that had very little ad revenue for reddit. It's why the protests didn't really work, reddit didn't give a shit about the million or so people who went with niche subs using 3rd party apps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Either TikTok will win in court and overturn the law (possible), be sold (unlikely) or shut down (likely). I can't see TikTok being sold being allowed by China, and even selling part of the business just creates a new global competitor to extend out of the US.

    Multiple competitors will appear in the meantime hoping to get the displaced activity. TikTok is hugely profitable and a dominant replacement in the US would make a lot of money. This will be seen as an opportunity to make a lot of money for the winner.

    I can see Meta trying to make a TikTok like clone, Google trying to leverage YouTube shorts, and Elon Musk trying to revive Vine at Twitter, plus lots of startups (mostly. American but possibly from other nations) vying to win the audience.

    Ironically the more interesting battle may be outside the US - TikTok versus whatever US app comes along.

    The deadline is after the US election - this could also all be political grandstanding and the politicians expectation might be that the law won't stand up in court anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    TikTok has hundreds of millions of users outside the US, they may just pull out [and then US users will VPN to use it like we're fucking Iran]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 66 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Find your voice?

    Ah, the only time you’re going to hear that from the Chinese company is when they want you to prevent someone coming between them and their data feed and profits.

    Nevermind the algorithms that suppress voices they don’t want to be heard.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Governments banning social media based on who can use it to spy on who, instead of creating privacy regulations and enforcing them to create and regulate markets, which is kinda what they should do, to make it so it doesn't matter who owns which app. Taking an opportunity and shitting all over it for some childish standoff should be beneath us.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago*

    It wont work either, there's so many legal tricks that can change the owner of a company without actually changing who controls the company.

    "TikTok was evil and controlled by China, so we banned it. Oh look, here's a totally new website called TokTik owned by a US Citizen named Mr. ILoveChina who built a TikTok replacement in 15 minutes by hiring foreign consultants for 2 cents an hour."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I think the tiktok fiasco is just another wrong solution to a problem. The problem is data collection and mismanagement of it; and no one is getting 'royalties' for their data being sold or used.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 48 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Chew responded to the latest moves in a video posted by the official TikTok account. "Make no mistake, this is a ban," Chew said in the video. "A ban on TikTok and a ban on you and your voice."

    Narrator: it wasn't.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    I've actually read the law, so no one has to tell me that it really, actually is about privacy. I know that it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    Lemmy users are just going to believe whatever they want to believe, instead of actually checking the facts.

    It's 100% about privacy. Data collection, and algorithm manipulation to sway what users see in the interest of the Chinese government. If users think Russian interference is a problem, we'll this amounts to the same thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    I hate tiktok. I am not from the US, but banning the app that is most popular among young people while raiding dozens of university campuses? Don't sound like a great way to get young people trust the system...

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    My tiktok feed was filled with videos from the protests, and has been filled w info on Palestine for the past half a year. I don't think this ban is a coincidence. Tiktok always has the fastest transmission of information from people on the scenes, kinda like Twitter back in the day.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Given how easy it is to create shell corporations, how does any of this prevent the CCP from running TikTok through another proxy?

    I.e. is all this posturing just a colossal waste of time?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    Now that it's happening, I don't quite know how to feel.

    I certainly don't feel sorry for Tiktok though.

  • source
  • [+] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I'm not for banning shit. I am for educating. We need to show people what TikTok really is, what it does and how it affects shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago

    The problem, from the government's perspective, is that there's no way to only see some of the fnords. If we teach people to recognize Chinese propaganda, they'll start to recognize American propaganda too. Better to keep us stupid and then control who's allowed to talk to us in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ah fuck it, its just the next step the US is just mad China got this privacy invader and not them. Meanwhile Meta is the internet to most of Africa.

    All major social medias have been toxic and invasive and only now does it matter to the US.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It's not about privacy. China and the US have all the data on you they could want. It's about control. TikTok has successfully activated their base to contact their representatives with a notification from the app. It shows that they could use it to influence our politics.

    China recognizes the danger, hence all western apps being banned. If they recognize the danger, then they must also recognize the utility. Are they using it? It's hard to say, but TikTok is what that would look like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] [B] 7 points 2 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    TikTok CEO Shou Chew has issued a rallying cry to users that the company plans to fight a possible US ban.

    A foreign-aid bill passed Tuesday by the US Senate and signed by President Joe Biden Wednesday has millions of Americans who use TikTok freaking out over a potential ban.

    The clip has over four million views as of Wednesday afternoon, and the comments show that users aren't ready to say goodbye to TikTok anytime soon.

    Many expressed support for Chew, whose call to action hints at the pressure building against TikTok and its Chinese owners, Bytedance.

    Others credited the platform for helping users find "their voice and livelihood" and providing "a sense of community here that we don't have anywhere else."

    Despite Chew's defiant video and the growing outrage from the app's users, a TikTok ban won't happen in the immediate future.


    The original article contains 261 words, the summary contains 143 words. Saved 45%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›