this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
178 points (96.4% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3587 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Donald Trump, fresh off his third appearance in court as a criminal defendant, delivered a speech full of defiance and bluster on Friday night, insulting prosecutors and declaring that the charges he faces only help his 2024 presidential campaign.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lol. I hate this man so fucking much but the dude is a master troll.

God damn I just want him to die on the toilet pissing and shidding himself so badly. It's really the only outcome that'd make sense

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

His supporters would fly into a rage and accuse Democrats of secretly murdering him just like Scalia. At least one of his supporters would probably commit a terrorist act in response.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’d take that inevitable result over him living any longer.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

I'd take that as inevitable period at this point.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

His supporters are already making up baseless conspiracies about their enemies and committing random acts of violence.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a fan of the David Carradine.

Your reputation never recovers from that sort of death.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

1.) I don't recall his death being anything of note, but then there's always 2.) his career was racist, no-talent shit beforehand anyhow.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You don't recall the autoerotic asphyxiation?

Found hanging by the neck on a curtain cord with his dick in his hand?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well. Yeah. It was the perfect end to his career.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Death by breath-play accident isn't the poetic justice you think it is. Let's not be shameless, hmm?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't kink shame, but unsafe breath play is the height of stupidity.

Also, there are no real conspiracy theories about the death. He accidentally hung himself in a closet while trying to get off.

Now imagine if a prominent Conservative died the same way, you'd never hear about them again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Unsafe breath play is redundant.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

The only reason I remember that is because of Eminem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That cool. But please put thought into him not being the sole producer of his own bullshit. Personally I believe he's controlled by the mob. Getting played out and sacrificed by other career criminals that want to own America.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I heard after your fourth indictment, you get one hamberder for free.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

He could be right, but it will come down to how the other Republican candidates handle it. If they get behind him and portray him as a martyr, there are certainly enough gullible (R) voters to deliver the election. We'll just need to see if the (D) turnout is strong enough to overcome that. On the other hand, if they unite against him, he'll lose the nomination, run independently, and split the (R) vote.

Option A is far more likely. We've seen over and over again that facts, legality, and consistency don't matter, but appointing judges does. A disgraced scumbag that appoints who he's told to appoint is infinitely more important than having "principles" without power.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

Let’s be honest here. That’s because his grift didn’t raise as much the last indictment. Diminishing returns, all that, and he hasn’t quite raised enough to pay off his legal fees.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — Former President Donald Trump, fresh off his third appearance in court as a criminal defendant, delivered a speech full of defiance and bluster on Friday night, insulting prosecutors and declaring that the charges he faces only help his 2024 presidential campaign.

But Trump was characteristically unapologetic as he took the stage Friday night to Lee Greenwood’s “God Bless the USA,” flashing a thumbs-up at the crowd, raising his fist and taking in a standing ovation of nearly three minutes.

Trump has continued to receive endorsements from GOP elected officials throughout the investigations and criminal cases, including on Friday from all six of the state’s Republican U.S. House members.

Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, who is waging an unprecedented campaign to try to change Pentagon abortion policy by holding up hundreds of military nominations and promotions, introduced Trump at the dinner on Friday night.

Trump’s mounting legal troubles do not seem to be dampening his support in the Deep South state that is among more than a dozen that will hold primary contests on Super Tuesday.

In Alabama, though, one gauge of interest doesn’t bode well for the governor: The state GOP sold about 1,000 fewer tickets for a similar dinner in March when DeSantis spoke.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Amazingly, people will still support him. A huge reason is that not supporting him would be admitting they were wrong.

After Nixon resigned, 30% of people still supported him.

After World War II, 30% of Germans still supported Hitler.

For some people, admitting they were wrong is fucking hard, and more people will pretend everything is good in order to not admit they were wrong. So even though it is clear he's an insane grifter who crimes like a madman, admitting it means the libs were right and they were wrong.

Admitting being wrong is too much to do.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If he keeps going like that, Uncle Sam might soon throw in free room and board for him.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Can't we just make it a vitamin shot and call it good?