▲ 1449 ▼ The state of Playstore (lemmy.dbzer0.com) submitted 3 years ago by svotay@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 294 comments fedilink hide all child comments Ads upon ads upon ads
[–] Sheltac@lemmy.world 41 points 3 years ago (3 children) No it wouldn’t. Phones aren’t cheap. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) They can be. I bought a Galaxy s22 with a broken screen for $150, and my carrier just gave me an $1100 credit for it on a new iphone. I don't need an iPhone, and I will be selling it to get yet another cheap phone and pocketing the money, but it goes to show just how much phones do not cost to the people producing them permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anomalous_Llama@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Dam that’s a hilarious life hack lol. I’m on a 12 Pro with no intentions of upgrading but when I go to I’m gonna try and find a new broken flagship to turn in too lmao. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 7 points 3 years ago (3 children) The Android licence is free and the Play Store infrastructure has to support tens of millions of devices. I'm not saying this is an acceptable level, but Samsung ain't putting a dollar toward Google running the store, in fact, they'd much prefer to run and maintain their own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com 30 points 3 years ago* (1 child) That's not true. Phone manufacturers need to pay if they want to include Google Play in their devices, it's not free. It can cost as much as $40 per device. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 7 points 3 years ago Thanks for the correction, I was unaware permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sheltac@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago I guess hoovering up all your data ain’t enough. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 years ago I don't even get why having the store on more devices is supposed to "cost" google anything. It's a store. They get a cut from every transaction. Why wouldn't they want it to be on everything? permalink fedilink source parent [–] sunglocto@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 years ago They shouldn't rely on ads to make money back on a phone IMHO. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) They can be. I bought a Galaxy s22 with a broken screen for $150, and my carrier just gave me an $1100 credit for it on a new iphone. I don't need an iPhone, and I will be selling it to get yet another cheap phone and pocketing the money, but it goes to show just how much phones do not cost to the people producing them permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Anomalous_Llama@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Dam that’s a hilarious life hack lol. I’m on a 12 Pro with no intentions of upgrading but when I go to I’m gonna try and find a new broken flagship to turn in too lmao. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anomalous_Llama@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Dam that’s a hilarious life hack lol. I’m on a 12 Pro with no intentions of upgrading but when I go to I’m gonna try and find a new broken flagship to turn in too lmao. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 7 points 3 years ago (3 children) The Android licence is free and the Play Store infrastructure has to support tens of millions of devices. I'm not saying this is an acceptable level, but Samsung ain't putting a dollar toward Google running the store, in fact, they'd much prefer to run and maintain their own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com 30 points 3 years ago* (1 child) That's not true. Phone manufacturers need to pay if they want to include Google Play in their devices, it's not free. It can cost as much as $40 per device. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 7 points 3 years ago Thanks for the correction, I was unaware permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sheltac@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago I guess hoovering up all your data ain’t enough. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 years ago I don't even get why having the store on more devices is supposed to "cost" google anything. It's a store. They get a cut from every transaction. Why wouldn't they want it to be on everything? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com 30 points 3 years ago* (1 child) That's not true. Phone manufacturers need to pay if they want to include Google Play in their devices, it's not free. It can cost as much as $40 per device. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 7 points 3 years ago Thanks for the correction, I was unaware permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 7 points 3 years ago Thanks for the correction, I was unaware permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sheltac@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago I guess hoovering up all your data ain’t enough. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 years ago I don't even get why having the store on more devices is supposed to "cost" google anything. It's a store. They get a cut from every transaction. Why wouldn't they want it to be on everything? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sunglocto@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 years ago They shouldn't rely on ads to make money back on a phone IMHO. permalink fedilink source parent