28
SlateScott talking race and IQ: very cool and truth seeking. Revealing SlateScott's powerword: what's the public interest in that? (www.lesswrong.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The actually not even really a hatchet job NYT piece on SlateScott that mostly just called him a weird little guy has nonetheless created a festering psychic wound that oozes to this day. Here manifests as an interview with the author on LW. See also: discussion on reddit.

My favorite section, talking about how people are mad that be brought up Scott's notorious race stuff™️:

CM: That's great. That's a valid position. There are other valid positions where people say, we need to not go so close to that, because it's dangerous and there's a slippery slope. The irony of this whole situation is that some people who feel that I should not have gone there, who think I should not explore the length and breadth of that situation, are the people who think you should always go there.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 years ago*

I particularly enjoyed, this time, watching whatever uppers he’s on these days kick in (or wear off?) about halfway through writing the footnote he added to that comment.

wow that remark is one massive cause of missing the blatantly fucking obvious, and/or intentionally being obtuse about it

e: then again, these are the people that put their SP into logorrhea and then only after dumping like 90% do they sometimes realize they might need it in other areas too

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent