this as well. But to me, it's not that it's the same, it's that one is different from the other, in an unrelated manner.

One could argue coins have the distinct advantage in this case of being highly divisible, which is very true.

The question here was not whether titties were tittes, because that's obvious. But whether one titty was better than the other titty. I think the point here is demonstrating that it's not about the monetary value. It's about how you perceive it.