you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 75 points 2 years ago (14 children)

I'm not. Imprison her for life, but the death penalty is never acceptable as long as there's even the slightest chance of a false conviction. As long as "the system" can get it wrong, it should not be allowed to carry out irreversible punishments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I get what you're saying and I can't say I disagree, but conversely:

    Eat the rich

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sadly, prions are terrifying, so eating the rich is not a practical possibility.

    Now, feeding them alive to the big cats at the zoo, on the other hand, would serve the same purpose, and entertain the kitties to boot, which the brain control parasites my kittens have infected me with tell me is a good thing, and since we don't eat them or anything that eats them there's no risk of prion spread, at least until deer chronic wasting disease inevitably spreads to humans and kills us all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    As they say, there are no moral ethical billionaires. In order to enrich themselves so much over their peers, they have necessarily trampled over them.

    I do agree that giving a government the official power to just execute whoever they want (it would be trivial to manufacture a case like this in Vietnam) is a very bad precedent to set.

    But, I mean, Vietnam is an authoritarian government, so this shouldn't surprise anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Innocent people dying of old age in prison is also irreversible and way fucking crueler.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    You're not wrong, but at least there's a chance that they'll be released, and with therapy they might even have a normal life again some day. If you kill someone, they're dead. Nothing you can do about it beyond maybe putting an "Oops, our bad, sorry about that" plaque on their headstone.

    I will also say that prisons should not be cruel. The role of prisons should be rehabilitation, protection of society from those who can't be rehabilitated, and lastly (and for once actually least importantly) punishment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The rehabilitation line is a lie people tell themselves to feel better about being ok with extreme cruelty

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    there are other countries who have actually worked successfully at rehabilitation rather than the US-based system of 'revenge as justice'.

    lumping everyone in line with the revenge types is an ignorant, immature stance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    i mean... abolish prisons too? Yes... I think yess :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yes but why just when the fate of billionaires is on the line?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago*

    I just support prison abolition in general, especially here in the US where I am. The shear number of poor, poc, indigenous, and mentally ill people who get funneled into the prison system here is a travesty and just pointless cruelty. TBH i dont give a fuck about one billionaire as long as the money is taken back and she loses all her power. Though I also do not support the death penalty so this headline doesn't make me feel super comfortable.

  • source
  • parent