▲ 671 ▼ suck it, math nerds (mander.xyz) submitted 2 years ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 96 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) "Find" not "define" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] GnomeKat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 2 years ago (2 children) Putting things in base 10 is also a definition. Digits aren't special. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) Was going to say the same. Also π isn't infinite. Far from it. it's not even bigger than 4. It's representation in the decimal system is just so that it can't be written there with a finite number of decimal places. But you could just write "π". It's short, concise and exact. And by that definition 0.1 is also infinite... My computer can't write that with a finite amount of digits in base 2, which it uses internally. So... I'm crying salty tears, too. [Edit: And we don't even need transcendental numbers or other number systems. A third also doesn't have a representation. So again following the logic... you can divide a cake into 5 pieces, but never into 3?!] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Can pi be expressed with a finite amount of digits in another number system? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (2 children) How about a pi based system, then pi is 1. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] mrsemi@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago You're correct. For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-integer_base_of_numeration permalink fedilink source parent [–] 33550336@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Possible, but then the diameter would be an irrational number permalink fedilink source parent [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don't think there's any technical reason we can't count in base pi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago I'm pretty happy with being able to write integers in a finite number of digits. Wouldn't want to give that up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well we need an integer base number system.... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) "A base is usually a whole number bigger than 1, although non-integer bases are also mathematically possible." https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_(mathematics) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) But it makes life harder permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Not if you're mainly interested in counting multiples of pi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago nπ is much better permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Not sure where you're going with the decimal thing. Pi had infinite digits in any integer base because it's irrational. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* I thought that was the joke in the comic? That we can't know numbers exactly that have an infinite decimal expansion. That'd be true for some rational numbers like a third, if you change the basis of the numeral system it'd be different numbers. And irrational numbers too if you have a integer base. But I'd argue how we write down a number isn't what determines exactness or 'infinity' by the words of the comic. permalink fedilink source parent [+] mrsemi@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 years ago That doesnt make a difference. You can find the exact circumference of a circle, you just cant express it in the decimal system as a number (thats why we have a symbol for it so you can still express the exact value) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GnomeKat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 2 years ago (2 children) Putting things in base 10 is also a definition. Digits aren't special. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) Was going to say the same. Also π isn't infinite. Far from it. it's not even bigger than 4. It's representation in the decimal system is just so that it can't be written there with a finite number of decimal places. But you could just write "π". It's short, concise and exact. And by that definition 0.1 is also infinite... My computer can't write that with a finite amount of digits in base 2, which it uses internally. So... I'm crying salty tears, too. [Edit: And we don't even need transcendental numbers or other number systems. A third also doesn't have a representation. So again following the logic... you can divide a cake into 5 pieces, but never into 3?!] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Can pi be expressed with a finite amount of digits in another number system? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (2 children) How about a pi based system, then pi is 1. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] mrsemi@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago You're correct. For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-integer_base_of_numeration permalink fedilink source parent [–] 33550336@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Possible, but then the diameter would be an irrational number permalink fedilink source parent [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don't think there's any technical reason we can't count in base pi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago I'm pretty happy with being able to write integers in a finite number of digits. Wouldn't want to give that up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well we need an integer base number system.... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) "A base is usually a whole number bigger than 1, although non-integer bases are also mathematically possible." https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_(mathematics) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) But it makes life harder permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Not if you're mainly interested in counting multiples of pi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago nπ is much better permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Not sure where you're going with the decimal thing. Pi had infinite digits in any integer base because it's irrational. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* I thought that was the joke in the comic? That we can't know numbers exactly that have an infinite decimal expansion. That'd be true for some rational numbers like a third, if you change the basis of the numeral system it'd be different numbers. And irrational numbers too if you have a integer base. But I'd argue how we write down a number isn't what determines exactness or 'infinity' by the words of the comic. permalink fedilink source parent [+] mrsemi@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children) Was going to say the same. Also π isn't infinite. Far from it. it's not even bigger than 4. It's representation in the decimal system is just so that it can't be written there with a finite number of decimal places. But you could just write "π". It's short, concise and exact. And by that definition 0.1 is also infinite... My computer can't write that with a finite amount of digits in base 2, which it uses internally. So... I'm crying salty tears, too. [Edit: And we don't even need transcendental numbers or other number systems. A third also doesn't have a representation. So again following the logic... you can divide a cake into 5 pieces, but never into 3?!] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Can pi be expressed with a finite amount of digits in another number system? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (2 children) How about a pi based system, then pi is 1. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] mrsemi@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago You're correct. For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-integer_base_of_numeration permalink fedilink source parent [–] 33550336@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Possible, but then the diameter would be an irrational number permalink fedilink source parent [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don't think there's any technical reason we can't count in base pi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago I'm pretty happy with being able to write integers in a finite number of digits. Wouldn't want to give that up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well we need an integer base number system.... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) "A base is usually a whole number bigger than 1, although non-integer bases are also mathematically possible." https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_(mathematics) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) But it makes life harder permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Not if you're mainly interested in counting multiples of pi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago nπ is much better permalink fedilink source parent [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Not sure where you're going with the decimal thing. Pi had infinite digits in any integer base because it's irrational. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* I thought that was the joke in the comic? That we can't know numbers exactly that have an infinite decimal expansion. That'd be true for some rational numbers like a third, if you change the basis of the numeral system it'd be different numbers. And irrational numbers too if you have a integer base. But I'd argue how we write down a number isn't what determines exactness or 'infinity' by the words of the comic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Can pi be expressed with a finite amount of digits in another number system? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (2 children) How about a pi based system, then pi is 1. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] mrsemi@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago You're correct. For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-integer_base_of_numeration permalink fedilink source parent [–] 33550336@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Possible, but then the diameter would be an irrational number permalink fedilink source parent [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don't think there's any technical reason we can't count in base pi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago I'm pretty happy with being able to write integers in a finite number of digits. Wouldn't want to give that up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well we need an integer base number system.... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) "A base is usually a whole number bigger than 1, although non-integer bases are also mathematically possible." https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_(mathematics) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) But it makes life harder permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Not if you're mainly interested in counting multiples of pi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago nπ is much better permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (2 children) How about a pi based system, then pi is 1. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] mrsemi@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago You're correct. For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-integer_base_of_numeration permalink fedilink source parent [–] 33550336@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Possible, but then the diameter would be an irrational number permalink fedilink source parent
[+] mrsemi@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago You're correct. For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-integer_base_of_numeration permalink fedilink source parent
[–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago You're correct. For reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-integer_base_of_numeration permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 33550336@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Possible, but then the diameter would be an irrational number permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago (2 children) I don't think there's any technical reason we can't count in base pi permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago I'm pretty happy with being able to write integers in a finite number of digits. Wouldn't want to give that up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well we need an integer base number system.... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) "A base is usually a whole number bigger than 1, although non-integer bases are also mathematically possible." https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_(mathematics) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) But it makes life harder permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Not if you're mainly interested in counting multiples of pi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago nπ is much better permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago I'm pretty happy with being able to write integers in a finite number of digits. Wouldn't want to give that up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well we need an integer base number system.... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) "A base is usually a whole number bigger than 1, although non-integer bases are also mathematically possible." https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_(mathematics) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) But it makes life harder permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Not if you're mainly interested in counting multiples of pi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago nπ is much better permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) "A base is usually a whole number bigger than 1, although non-integer bases are also mathematically possible." https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_(mathematics) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) But it makes life harder permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Not if you're mainly interested in counting multiples of pi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago nπ is much better permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) But it makes life harder permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Not if you're mainly interested in counting multiples of pi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago nπ is much better permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Not if you're mainly interested in counting multiples of pi. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago nπ is much better permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 2 years ago nπ is much better permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Not sure where you're going with the decimal thing. Pi had infinite digits in any integer base because it's irrational. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* I thought that was the joke in the comic? That we can't know numbers exactly that have an infinite decimal expansion. That'd be true for some rational numbers like a third, if you change the basis of the numeral system it'd be different numbers. And irrational numbers too if you have a integer base. But I'd argue how we write down a number isn't what determines exactness or 'infinity' by the words of the comic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* I thought that was the joke in the comic? That we can't know numbers exactly that have an infinite decimal expansion. That'd be true for some rational numbers like a third, if you change the basis of the numeral system it'd be different numbers. And irrational numbers too if you have a integer base. But I'd argue how we write down a number isn't what determines exactness or 'infinity' by the words of the comic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 years ago That doesnt make a difference. You can find the exact circumference of a circle, you just cant express it in the decimal system as a number (thats why we have a symbol for it so you can still express the exact value) permalink fedilink source parent