▲ 460 ▼ The New Audi A3 Is Amess With In-Car Subscriptions (www.motor1.com) submitted 2 years ago by absquatulate@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 196 comments fedilink hide all child comments So far there's subscriptions for cruise control, adaptive beams, various navigation options, apple/google integration and my favorite, dual-zone climate.
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Tesla, certainly. BMW also. Subaru still seems to be okay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ramble81@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Tesla was one of the original pioneers with FSD subscriptions. BMW had heated seat subscriptions but walked it back. They do have a subscription for the “drive recorder” camera but you can pay a one time fee to permanently unlock it so that’s at least acceptable. Edit: incidentally the permanent price is the same as if you bought it on your car new. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) They do have a subscription for the “drive recorder” camera but you can pay a one time fee to permanently unlock it so that’s at least acceptable. Edit: incidentally the permanent price is the same as if you bought it on your car new. I disagree: if the physical hardware came on the car, the owner is entitled to use it (that's how property rights work). Therefore, BMW should be forced to either charge everybody for it as a standard feature or physically not include the hardware for the people who aren't getting it. Hardware that's artificially locked behind DRM -- which is what being "activatable" by even a one-time fee after the fact really is -- is a direct attack on property rights and therefore entirely unacceptable! permalink fedilink source parent [–] wjrii@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago I have a 2022. It's not terrible, but there's definitely a subscription for remote start and a few other connected type features. Nothing related to actual driving once you're in the car though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Tesla was one of the original pioneers with FSD subscriptions. BMW had heated seat subscriptions but walked it back. They do have a subscription for the “drive recorder” camera but you can pay a one time fee to permanently unlock it so that’s at least acceptable. Edit: incidentally the permanent price is the same as if you bought it on your car new. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) They do have a subscription for the “drive recorder” camera but you can pay a one time fee to permanently unlock it so that’s at least acceptable. Edit: incidentally the permanent price is the same as if you bought it on your car new. I disagree: if the physical hardware came on the car, the owner is entitled to use it (that's how property rights work). Therefore, BMW should be forced to either charge everybody for it as a standard feature or physically not include the hardware for the people who aren't getting it. Hardware that's artificially locked behind DRM -- which is what being "activatable" by even a one-time fee after the fact really is -- is a direct attack on property rights and therefore entirely unacceptable! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) They do have a subscription for the “drive recorder” camera but you can pay a one time fee to permanently unlock it so that’s at least acceptable. Edit: incidentally the permanent price is the same as if you bought it on your car new. I disagree: if the physical hardware came on the car, the owner is entitled to use it (that's how property rights work). Therefore, BMW should be forced to either charge everybody for it as a standard feature or physically not include the hardware for the people who aren't getting it. Hardware that's artificially locked behind DRM -- which is what being "activatable" by even a one-time fee after the fact really is -- is a direct attack on property rights and therefore entirely unacceptable! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago I have a 2022. It's not terrible, but there's definitely a subscription for remote start and a few other connected type features. Nothing related to actual driving once you're in the car though. permalink fedilink source parent