Asklemmy

hideshow 7 child comments

parent

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Because it's still acting as a descriptor rather than an identifier, despite playing the syntactic role of a noun instead of an adjective. It's more about semantics in this case than syntax.

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

No it is playing the syntactic role of a noun. An object is a noun.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I know it's playing the syntactic role of a noun, that's what I said. But it's playing the semantic role of a descriptor. The "thing" being described here is a suspect, one that is white and also male, as opposed to a male who is white and also suspected.

Syntactically, the word male was a noun. But semantically, it's still just describing the suspect, rather than identifying the thing to be described.

parent

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

"Suspect" is the noun

hideshow 3 child comments

parent

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 8 points 2 years ago

Both are nouns. Suspect is the subject, male is the object. You could replace it with, for example "the suspect is a cat", and I think we can all agree "cat" is a noun. "six foot" and "white" are the adjectives in that sentence.

parent

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Both are nouns there. Suspect is the subject.

parent

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

So you don’t think this argument would hold up if they said “Police are searching for a six foot white male”?