Was just talking at dinner with family, and it seems a logical action to ban circumcision, as in most cases, doesn't have consent, and is a major (genitals are important) body modification. Can we ban it at the state level? Just a thought.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Good for you not being bothered by it. But I think it's rather easy to imagine that it can be a traumatizing experience and lead to psychological or physiological injuries. So it's a medical procedure that should only be prescribed by doctors or if you are an adult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sure, I'm not arguing against that. I'm arguing against this mentality that everyone who has been circumcised should be carrying trauma over it, or must be carrying trauma but are lying to themselves. Don't say you're fighting on my behalf for something that doesn't bother me in the slightest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Fair point, not sure somebody is doing it and if so why, but that would be indeed contra productive. If someone does not feel traumatized why would anyone would want to convince them otherwise?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Fair point, not sure somebody is doing it and if so why, but that would be indeed contra productive

    The post I was replying to:

    For some reason, they refuse to admit they were mutilated without their consent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    For some reason, they refuse to admit they were mutilated without their consent.

    I'm not sure that is exactly how they meant it, but I can see you interpret it that way. An unnecessary, irreversible medical operation was performed on you without your consent, but since you are not bothered by it - good for you.

  • source
  • parent