you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 2 years ago

In correct law, that'd be copyright-violation committed by your ISP:

IF the website you hit didn't authorize your ISP to create a derivative-work,

THEN your ISP adulterating it should be considered commercial-copyright-violation, and stomped by the copyright-lobby.


Notice how this has been going-on for decades, and the copyright-lobby .. ignores it, to stomp-on individuals only..

Interesting evidence of "rule of 'law'", isn't it?

  • source
  • parent