▲ 1133 ▼ EU votes to mandate removable batteries in smartphones in a landslide; no more glued together junk! (www.youtube.com) submitted 3 years ago by Roman0@lemmy.world to c/android@lemmy.world 266 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Otakeb@lemmy.world 15 points 3 years ago (1 child) I hope everything just becomes brushed aluminum ffs. I hate all these glass back phones permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wheels@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (5 children) Phones only have glass backs to let wireless charging work so I don’t see aluminium making a come back any time soon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] JCreazy@midwest.social 9 points 3 years ago (2 children) Wireless charging isn't all that needed IMO. It's kind of old technology, my phone had it 10 years ago but none of my phones have had it since and I haven't really missed it because USB C charging is fast enough where wireless charging isn't really necessary. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's also a gimmick afaic, it's not "Wireless" to me until it can charge contactless from a distance. This not-really-wireless wireless crap just moved the connection and made it magnetic instead of a plug. It's a glorified magsafe lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sancthuary@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Hell yeah, dont understand why people are big about this while it just contact charging. It doesnt even charge phone fast nor efficient. Funny people keep bragging about waste while they use inefficient charging method which waste more energy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@lemm.ee -1 points 3 years ago It's inefficient, but it doesn't depend on a finnicky-ass charging port so that's nice. When Apple goes USB-C on iPhones, I will unfortunately have to start using wireless charging, because USB-C ports are so annoying to clean compared to Lightning, I don't plan on having a functional one after a year of owning a USB-C phone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago I'd never want to get rid of wired charging, but wireless is a really nice option. I'm never able to find a good angle/spot for my phone in my car with a wire sticking out of it. Even with a dashboard mount, I would prefer the mount itself be powered to avoid having the cable just hanging with the pull of gravity on it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Otakeb@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago* (4 children) I hate wireless charging too, though. It's inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, I can still use my phone while it's plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] electriccars@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Couldn't disagree more. Wireless charging with magnetic attachment like magsafe is a godsend for using my phone as a GPS. Just slap it onto it's magnetic wireless charger and go. Pull it off when done. A million times better than the old chargers that grip the phone and then also having to plug it in every time I need to drive somewhere, then undo it all when I get there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sancthuary@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago Jesus Christ permalink fedilink source parent [–] mikestevens@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) I'm pretty glad to have both options. I take your point about using it while charging, but I also find myself having to jump up from my desk quite a bit, and it's nice to be able to just pick up my phone without first unplugging it. And I imagine all of that plugging and unplugging is reducing the durability of the port over time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Otakeb@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I really like the magnetic charging port plug adaptors for situations like that, but personally, if I'm jumping up and down from my desk at work or something and have my phone plugged in, I'll just leave it on my desk while I'm away. And if I'm not coming back to it for a good bit, the extra half second it takes to unplug my phone is more than worth the more efficient power transfer, imo. But to each their own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mikestevens@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Each to their own indeed! permalink fedilink source parent [–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) I interested in how your hate for wireless charging has anything to do with this thread? We've had wireless charging in every single material back and it's absolutely wonderful QOL improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hexarei@programming.dev 2 points 3 years ago It can't be done through metal backs, for what it's worth. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one -1 points 3 years ago* (1 child) WTF? Just don't use wireless charging ffs. What a dumb opinion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] V0lD@programming.dev 13 points 3 years ago (2 children) Considering it comes at the cost of your phone being more fragile, the argument is not without merit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NotYourSocialWorker@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago And the extra costs to support a feature I never use. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) What does wireless charging has to do with phones being more fragile? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] V0lD@programming.dev 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) The glass backs that this conversation started with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) I hate wireless charging too, though. It's inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, can still use my phone while it's plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo. Glass isn't mentioned nowhere in this comment which started this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That comment did not start the conversation, it was a response to the comment above it, which directly mentions glass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's why I deleted my comment almost immediately after posting it. Now I'm wondering how were you able to reply to it few hours later. Guess this Lemmy thing is still buggy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Ah, makes sense. Yeah it still exists on my instance. Hopefully the underlying bug gets resolved, since it's now wasted both of our time :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago Metal backs are incompatible with wireless charging. So that leaves ceramic, plastic and glass. Plastic isn't "premium" enough apparently so that leaves ceramic and glass both of which are fragile permalink fedilink source parent [–] feduser934@vlemmy.net 5 points 3 years ago Plastic also works, and is far more durable permalink fedilink source parent [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago Phone manufacturers: "Man this glass stuff likes to shatter a lot no matter what we try to make it stronger. I know, let's wrap the whole phone in it that'll solve everything!!!! 111" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Omega@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago We had phones with glass backs before wireless charging was widespread (see sony xperia z phones from 8+ years ago for example) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wheels@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (5 children) Phones only have glass backs to let wireless charging work so I don’t see aluminium making a come back any time soon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] JCreazy@midwest.social 9 points 3 years ago (2 children) Wireless charging isn't all that needed IMO. It's kind of old technology, my phone had it 10 years ago but none of my phones have had it since and I haven't really missed it because USB C charging is fast enough where wireless charging isn't really necessary. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's also a gimmick afaic, it's not "Wireless" to me until it can charge contactless from a distance. This not-really-wireless wireless crap just moved the connection and made it magnetic instead of a plug. It's a glorified magsafe lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sancthuary@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Hell yeah, dont understand why people are big about this while it just contact charging. It doesnt even charge phone fast nor efficient. Funny people keep bragging about waste while they use inefficient charging method which waste more energy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@lemm.ee -1 points 3 years ago It's inefficient, but it doesn't depend on a finnicky-ass charging port so that's nice. When Apple goes USB-C on iPhones, I will unfortunately have to start using wireless charging, because USB-C ports are so annoying to clean compared to Lightning, I don't plan on having a functional one after a year of owning a USB-C phone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago I'd never want to get rid of wired charging, but wireless is a really nice option. I'm never able to find a good angle/spot for my phone in my car with a wire sticking out of it. Even with a dashboard mount, I would prefer the mount itself be powered to avoid having the cable just hanging with the pull of gravity on it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Otakeb@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago* (4 children) I hate wireless charging too, though. It's inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, I can still use my phone while it's plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] electriccars@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Couldn't disagree more. Wireless charging with magnetic attachment like magsafe is a godsend for using my phone as a GPS. Just slap it onto it's magnetic wireless charger and go. Pull it off when done. A million times better than the old chargers that grip the phone and then also having to plug it in every time I need to drive somewhere, then undo it all when I get there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sancthuary@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago Jesus Christ permalink fedilink source parent [–] mikestevens@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) I'm pretty glad to have both options. I take your point about using it while charging, but I also find myself having to jump up from my desk quite a bit, and it's nice to be able to just pick up my phone without first unplugging it. And I imagine all of that plugging and unplugging is reducing the durability of the port over time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Otakeb@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I really like the magnetic charging port plug adaptors for situations like that, but personally, if I'm jumping up and down from my desk at work or something and have my phone plugged in, I'll just leave it on my desk while I'm away. And if I'm not coming back to it for a good bit, the extra half second it takes to unplug my phone is more than worth the more efficient power transfer, imo. But to each their own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mikestevens@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Each to their own indeed! permalink fedilink source parent [–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) I interested in how your hate for wireless charging has anything to do with this thread? We've had wireless charging in every single material back and it's absolutely wonderful QOL improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hexarei@programming.dev 2 points 3 years ago It can't be done through metal backs, for what it's worth. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one -1 points 3 years ago* (1 child) WTF? Just don't use wireless charging ffs. What a dumb opinion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] V0lD@programming.dev 13 points 3 years ago (2 children) Considering it comes at the cost of your phone being more fragile, the argument is not without merit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NotYourSocialWorker@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago And the extra costs to support a feature I never use. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) What does wireless charging has to do with phones being more fragile? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] V0lD@programming.dev 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) The glass backs that this conversation started with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) I hate wireless charging too, though. It's inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, can still use my phone while it's plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo. Glass isn't mentioned nowhere in this comment which started this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That comment did not start the conversation, it was a response to the comment above it, which directly mentions glass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's why I deleted my comment almost immediately after posting it. Now I'm wondering how were you able to reply to it few hours later. Guess this Lemmy thing is still buggy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Ah, makes sense. Yeah it still exists on my instance. Hopefully the underlying bug gets resolved, since it's now wasted both of our time :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago Metal backs are incompatible with wireless charging. So that leaves ceramic, plastic and glass. Plastic isn't "premium" enough apparently so that leaves ceramic and glass both of which are fragile permalink fedilink source parent [–] feduser934@vlemmy.net 5 points 3 years ago Plastic also works, and is far more durable permalink fedilink source parent [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago Phone manufacturers: "Man this glass stuff likes to shatter a lot no matter what we try to make it stronger. I know, let's wrap the whole phone in it that'll solve everything!!!! 111" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Omega@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago We had phones with glass backs before wireless charging was widespread (see sony xperia z phones from 8+ years ago for example) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 9 points 3 years ago (2 children) Wireless charging isn't all that needed IMO. It's kind of old technology, my phone had it 10 years ago but none of my phones have had it since and I haven't really missed it because USB C charging is fast enough where wireless charging isn't really necessary. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's also a gimmick afaic, it's not "Wireless" to me until it can charge contactless from a distance. This not-really-wireless wireless crap just moved the connection and made it magnetic instead of a plug. It's a glorified magsafe lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sancthuary@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Hell yeah, dont understand why people are big about this while it just contact charging. It doesnt even charge phone fast nor efficient. Funny people keep bragging about waste while they use inefficient charging method which waste more energy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@lemm.ee -1 points 3 years ago It's inefficient, but it doesn't depend on a finnicky-ass charging port so that's nice. When Apple goes USB-C on iPhones, I will unfortunately have to start using wireless charging, because USB-C ports are so annoying to clean compared to Lightning, I don't plan on having a functional one after a year of owning a USB-C phone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago I'd never want to get rid of wired charging, but wireless is a really nice option. I'm never able to find a good angle/spot for my phone in my car with a wire sticking out of it. Even with a dashboard mount, I would prefer the mount itself be powered to avoid having the cable just hanging with the pull of gravity on it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's also a gimmick afaic, it's not "Wireless" to me until it can charge contactless from a distance. This not-really-wireless wireless crap just moved the connection and made it magnetic instead of a plug. It's a glorified magsafe lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sancthuary@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Hell yeah, dont understand why people are big about this while it just contact charging. It doesnt even charge phone fast nor efficient. Funny people keep bragging about waste while they use inefficient charging method which waste more energy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@lemm.ee -1 points 3 years ago It's inefficient, but it doesn't depend on a finnicky-ass charging port so that's nice. When Apple goes USB-C on iPhones, I will unfortunately have to start using wireless charging, because USB-C ports are so annoying to clean compared to Lightning, I don't plan on having a functional one after a year of owning a USB-C phone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sancthuary@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Hell yeah, dont understand why people are big about this while it just contact charging. It doesnt even charge phone fast nor efficient. Funny people keep bragging about waste while they use inefficient charging method which waste more energy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@lemm.ee -1 points 3 years ago It's inefficient, but it doesn't depend on a finnicky-ass charging port so that's nice. When Apple goes USB-C on iPhones, I will unfortunately have to start using wireless charging, because USB-C ports are so annoying to clean compared to Lightning, I don't plan on having a functional one after a year of owning a USB-C phone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee -1 points 3 years ago It's inefficient, but it doesn't depend on a finnicky-ass charging port so that's nice. When Apple goes USB-C on iPhones, I will unfortunately have to start using wireless charging, because USB-C ports are so annoying to clean compared to Lightning, I don't plan on having a functional one after a year of owning a USB-C phone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago I'd never want to get rid of wired charging, but wireless is a really nice option. I'm never able to find a good angle/spot for my phone in my car with a wire sticking out of it. Even with a dashboard mount, I would prefer the mount itself be powered to avoid having the cable just hanging with the pull of gravity on it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Otakeb@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago* (4 children) I hate wireless charging too, though. It's inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, I can still use my phone while it's plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] electriccars@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Couldn't disagree more. Wireless charging with magnetic attachment like magsafe is a godsend for using my phone as a GPS. Just slap it onto it's magnetic wireless charger and go. Pull it off when done. A million times better than the old chargers that grip the phone and then also having to plug it in every time I need to drive somewhere, then undo it all when I get there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sancthuary@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago Jesus Christ permalink fedilink source parent [–] mikestevens@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) I'm pretty glad to have both options. I take your point about using it while charging, but I also find myself having to jump up from my desk quite a bit, and it's nice to be able to just pick up my phone without first unplugging it. And I imagine all of that plugging and unplugging is reducing the durability of the port over time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Otakeb@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I really like the magnetic charging port plug adaptors for situations like that, but personally, if I'm jumping up and down from my desk at work or something and have my phone plugged in, I'll just leave it on my desk while I'm away. And if I'm not coming back to it for a good bit, the extra half second it takes to unplug my phone is more than worth the more efficient power transfer, imo. But to each their own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mikestevens@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Each to their own indeed! permalink fedilink source parent [–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) I interested in how your hate for wireless charging has anything to do with this thread? We've had wireless charging in every single material back and it's absolutely wonderful QOL improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hexarei@programming.dev 2 points 3 years ago It can't be done through metal backs, for what it's worth. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one -1 points 3 years ago* (1 child) WTF? Just don't use wireless charging ffs. What a dumb opinion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] V0lD@programming.dev 13 points 3 years ago (2 children) Considering it comes at the cost of your phone being more fragile, the argument is not without merit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NotYourSocialWorker@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago And the extra costs to support a feature I never use. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) What does wireless charging has to do with phones being more fragile? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] V0lD@programming.dev 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) The glass backs that this conversation started with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) I hate wireless charging too, though. It's inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, can still use my phone while it's plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo. Glass isn't mentioned nowhere in this comment which started this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That comment did not start the conversation, it was a response to the comment above it, which directly mentions glass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's why I deleted my comment almost immediately after posting it. Now I'm wondering how were you able to reply to it few hours later. Guess this Lemmy thing is still buggy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Ah, makes sense. Yeah it still exists on my instance. Hopefully the underlying bug gets resolved, since it's now wasted both of our time :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago Metal backs are incompatible with wireless charging. So that leaves ceramic, plastic and glass. Plastic isn't "premium" enough apparently so that leaves ceramic and glass both of which are fragile permalink fedilink source parent
[–] electriccars@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Couldn't disagree more. Wireless charging with magnetic attachment like magsafe is a godsend for using my phone as a GPS. Just slap it onto it's magnetic wireless charger and go. Pull it off when done. A million times better than the old chargers that grip the phone and then also having to plug it in every time I need to drive somewhere, then undo it all when I get there. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sancthuary@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago Jesus Christ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mikestevens@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) I'm pretty glad to have both options. I take your point about using it while charging, but I also find myself having to jump up from my desk quite a bit, and it's nice to be able to just pick up my phone without first unplugging it. And I imagine all of that plugging and unplugging is reducing the durability of the port over time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Otakeb@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I really like the magnetic charging port plug adaptors for situations like that, but personally, if I'm jumping up and down from my desk at work or something and have my phone plugged in, I'll just leave it on my desk while I'm away. And if I'm not coming back to it for a good bit, the extra half second it takes to unplug my phone is more than worth the more efficient power transfer, imo. But to each their own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mikestevens@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Each to their own indeed! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Otakeb@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I really like the magnetic charging port plug adaptors for situations like that, but personally, if I'm jumping up and down from my desk at work or something and have my phone plugged in, I'll just leave it on my desk while I'm away. And if I'm not coming back to it for a good bit, the extra half second it takes to unplug my phone is more than worth the more efficient power transfer, imo. But to each their own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mikestevens@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Each to their own indeed! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mikestevens@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Each to their own indeed! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) I interested in how your hate for wireless charging has anything to do with this thread? We've had wireless charging in every single material back and it's absolutely wonderful QOL improvement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hexarei@programming.dev 2 points 3 years ago It can't be done through metal backs, for what it's worth. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 2 points 3 years ago It can't be done through metal backs, for what it's worth. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one -1 points 3 years ago* (1 child) WTF? Just don't use wireless charging ffs. What a dumb opinion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] V0lD@programming.dev 13 points 3 years ago (2 children) Considering it comes at the cost of your phone being more fragile, the argument is not without merit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NotYourSocialWorker@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago And the extra costs to support a feature I never use. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) What does wireless charging has to do with phones being more fragile? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] V0lD@programming.dev 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) The glass backs that this conversation started with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) I hate wireless charging too, though. It's inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, can still use my phone while it's plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo. Glass isn't mentioned nowhere in this comment which started this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That comment did not start the conversation, it was a response to the comment above it, which directly mentions glass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's why I deleted my comment almost immediately after posting it. Now I'm wondering how were you able to reply to it few hours later. Guess this Lemmy thing is still buggy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Ah, makes sense. Yeah it still exists on my instance. Hopefully the underlying bug gets resolved, since it's now wasted both of our time :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago Metal backs are incompatible with wireless charging. So that leaves ceramic, plastic and glass. Plastic isn't "premium" enough apparently so that leaves ceramic and glass both of which are fragile permalink fedilink source parent
[–] V0lD@programming.dev 13 points 3 years ago (2 children) Considering it comes at the cost of your phone being more fragile, the argument is not without merit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NotYourSocialWorker@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago And the extra costs to support a feature I never use. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) What does wireless charging has to do with phones being more fragile? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] V0lD@programming.dev 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) The glass backs that this conversation started with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) I hate wireless charging too, though. It's inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, can still use my phone while it's plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo. Glass isn't mentioned nowhere in this comment which started this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That comment did not start the conversation, it was a response to the comment above it, which directly mentions glass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's why I deleted my comment almost immediately after posting it. Now I'm wondering how were you able to reply to it few hours later. Guess this Lemmy thing is still buggy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Ah, makes sense. Yeah it still exists on my instance. Hopefully the underlying bug gets resolved, since it's now wasted both of our time :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago Metal backs are incompatible with wireless charging. So that leaves ceramic, plastic and glass. Plastic isn't "premium" enough apparently so that leaves ceramic and glass both of which are fragile permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NotYourSocialWorker@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago And the extra costs to support a feature I never use. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) What does wireless charging has to do with phones being more fragile? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] V0lD@programming.dev 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) The glass backs that this conversation started with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) I hate wireless charging too, though. It's inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, can still use my phone while it's plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo. Glass isn't mentioned nowhere in this comment which started this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That comment did not start the conversation, it was a response to the comment above it, which directly mentions glass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's why I deleted my comment almost immediately after posting it. Now I'm wondering how were you able to reply to it few hours later. Guess this Lemmy thing is still buggy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Ah, makes sense. Yeah it still exists on my instance. Hopefully the underlying bug gets resolved, since it's now wasted both of our time :) permalink fedilink source parent [–] cm0002@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago Metal backs are incompatible with wireless charging. So that leaves ceramic, plastic and glass. Plastic isn't "premium" enough apparently so that leaves ceramic and glass both of which are fragile permalink fedilink source parent
[–] V0lD@programming.dev 13 points 3 years ago (1 child) The glass backs that this conversation started with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) I hate wireless charging too, though. It's inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, can still use my phone while it's plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo. Glass isn't mentioned nowhere in this comment which started this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That comment did not start the conversation, it was a response to the comment above it, which directly mentions glass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's why I deleted my comment almost immediately after posting it. Now I'm wondering how were you able to reply to it few hours later. Guess this Lemmy thing is still buggy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Ah, makes sense. Yeah it still exists on my instance. Hopefully the underlying bug gets resolved, since it's now wasted both of our time :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) I hate wireless charging too, though. It's inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, can still use my phone while it's plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo. Glass isn't mentioned nowhere in this comment which started this conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That comment did not start the conversation, it was a response to the comment above it, which directly mentions glass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's why I deleted my comment almost immediately after posting it. Now I'm wondering how were you able to reply to it few hours later. Guess this Lemmy thing is still buggy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Ah, makes sense. Yeah it still exists on my instance. Hopefully the underlying bug gets resolved, since it's now wasted both of our time :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) That comment did not start the conversation, it was a response to the comment above it, which directly mentions glass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's why I deleted my comment almost immediately after posting it. Now I'm wondering how were you able to reply to it few hours later. Guess this Lemmy thing is still buggy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Ah, makes sense. Yeah it still exists on my instance. Hopefully the underlying bug gets resolved, since it's now wasted both of our time :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ErikDegenerik@lemmy.one 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's why I deleted my comment almost immediately after posting it. Now I'm wondering how were you able to reply to it few hours later. Guess this Lemmy thing is still buggy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Ah, makes sense. Yeah it still exists on my instance. Hopefully the underlying bug gets resolved, since it's now wasted both of our time :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago Ah, makes sense. Yeah it still exists on my instance. Hopefully the underlying bug gets resolved, since it's now wasted both of our time :) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago Metal backs are incompatible with wireless charging. So that leaves ceramic, plastic and glass. Plastic isn't "premium" enough apparently so that leaves ceramic and glass both of which are fragile permalink fedilink source parent
[–] feduser934@vlemmy.net 5 points 3 years ago Plastic also works, and is far more durable permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago Phone manufacturers: "Man this glass stuff likes to shatter a lot no matter what we try to make it stronger. I know, let's wrap the whole phone in it that'll solve everything!!!! 111" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Omega@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago We had phones with glass backs before wireless charging was widespread (see sony xperia z phones from 8+ years ago for example) permalink fedilink source parent