this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
1211 points (99.6% liked)

World News

39102 readers
3104 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Plastic producers have known for more than 30 years that recycling is not an economically or technically feasible plastic waste management solution. That has not stopped them from promoting it, according to a new report.

“The companies lied,” said Richard Wiles, president of fossil-fuel accountability advocacy group the Center for Climate Integrity (CCI), which published the report. “It’s time to hold them accountable for the damage they’ve caused.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This isn't an excuse to not recycle. The problem is not the very idea of recycling, but that things aren't made with it in mind. Everything should be designed for reuse, repair and recycling.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

If reduce makes harder to reuse, repair or recycle, then reduce could be a false economy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Reduction in this case is bolstering reuse, repair, and recycling. By having a lower consumption rate overall, you will, automatically, have fewer resources that need to be reused, repaired, or recycled.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm good with that. Done properly, the less usage should translate to lower prices. Though part of the price right here is not currently on the spreadsheet. The environmental cost of end of life is not part of the upfront cost, right now anyway....

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Sounds like we should just tow life outside of the environment. Worked for that boat.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No economy involved. Reducing means reducing the amount of plastic in circulation (theoretically).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That I'm fine with. I'd like to go back to glass, wood and metal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hemp based materials is goat because glass and metal will be more expensive to ship.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Bottle/can locally. What would concern me about hemp is land use.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but hemp needs far fewer chemicals and it is biodegradable. Plus it needs far less land to produce fiber.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Less land to produce fiber compared to what? If it's vertically farmed, I'd be happy with it. Though I'd move as much farming as I can to vertical farming to free up land for nature.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ah, you are talking about paper and carboard. I thought you meant cotton fibre. As long as it can be recycled.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Thread is made out of the material that is separated from the Hurd. Any seeds you get are 30% oil by volume, and they are high in protein. Basically the entire plant has built in uses, and I want it to become an everyday product. This is basically a full drop in replacement for corn only 100% usable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Metal-plastic is good friction pair

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

True, but it doesn't count as reduce then.