▲ 1723 ▼ It's official: Smartphones will need to have replaceable batteries by 2027 (www.androidauthority.com) submitted 3 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 267 comments fedilink hide all child comments Do you miss phones with replaceable batteries? By 2027, you won't anymore because, by law, almost every smartphone will have them again.
[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 years ago (2 children) * in Europe Tim Cook can suck a fat one. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) Oftentimes EU device laws affect other markets because it's easier to send the same device everywhere than to design and produce a separate one just for Europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stuka@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I don't see Apple paying for wildly different phone designs for different markets. But I have no doubts they'll find some new way to make their phones worthless after 2 or so years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Updates. That's all you need to know. They've already be caught with the whole slow phone after updates to make you buy a new phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I used to say that- but, they did actually have an argument for that- consistent battery life in exchange for lower performance. They thought users would prefer lowering performance of the phone so the battery still lasts just as long- and honestly I don't think they're that wrong. 95% of the time as long as it's usuable I don't care about the performance of my phone- but I do care about battery life. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MrGeekman@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago* He'd probably just enjoy it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) Oftentimes EU device laws affect other markets because it's easier to send the same device everywhere than to design and produce a separate one just for Europe. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stuka@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I don't see Apple paying for wildly different phone designs for different markets. But I have no doubts they'll find some new way to make their phones worthless after 2 or so years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Updates. That's all you need to know. They've already be caught with the whole slow phone after updates to make you buy a new phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I used to say that- but, they did actually have an argument for that- consistent battery life in exchange for lower performance. They thought users would prefer lowering performance of the phone so the battery still lasts just as long- and honestly I don't think they're that wrong. 95% of the time as long as it's usuable I don't care about the performance of my phone- but I do care about battery life. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Stuka@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) Yeah I don't see Apple paying for wildly different phone designs for different markets. But I have no doubts they'll find some new way to make their phones worthless after 2 or so years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Updates. That's all you need to know. They've already be caught with the whole slow phone after updates to make you buy a new phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I used to say that- but, they did actually have an argument for that- consistent battery life in exchange for lower performance. They thought users would prefer lowering performance of the phone so the battery still lasts just as long- and honestly I don't think they're that wrong. 95% of the time as long as it's usuable I don't care about the performance of my phone- but I do care about battery life. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) Updates. That's all you need to know. They've already be caught with the whole slow phone after updates to make you buy a new phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I used to say that- but, they did actually have an argument for that- consistent battery life in exchange for lower performance. They thought users would prefer lowering performance of the phone so the battery still lasts just as long- and honestly I don't think they're that wrong. 95% of the time as long as it's usuable I don't care about the performance of my phone- but I do care about battery life. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago I used to say that- but, they did actually have an argument for that- consistent battery life in exchange for lower performance. They thought users would prefer lowering performance of the phone so the battery still lasts just as long- and honestly I don't think they're that wrong. 95% of the time as long as it's usuable I don't care about the performance of my phone- but I do care about battery life. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MrGeekman@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago* He'd probably just enjoy it. permalink fedilink source parent