this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
22 points (84.4% liked)

Be sure to read the rule before you leave

1098 readers
2 users here now

Rule 3: If you visit MoreTankie196, you are contractually obliged to post before you leave

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

it’s my interpretation of an annoying, terminally online kid.

I think this might be the issue? A similar stereotype of terminally online people is constantly used as an ableist strawman by reactionaries. A layman looking at this meme wouldn’t be able to differentiate how it’s humor would be any different from an ancient 2012 meme making fun of furries.

I don’t think you intended this, especially because it’s become it’s own stereotype people reproduce unconsciously, but the criticism is valid as a general criticism of meme culture in general.

I do feel like the top level comment wasn’t even thinking from this perspective and may just be trying to stir up shit but obviously I can’t prove that. I apologize if that is wrong.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You do have a point, although I haven't been around the internet that long so I haven't seen any of those. However, what else would a terminally online guy be portrayed? This isn't intended as a "gotcha", I'm just curious what alternatives there are.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a computer in the room, the room looks relatively normal, but in front of it there is a blue glow in the shape of a person on one side, but on the other side not facing the screen there is nothing, indicating that his only existence is online, but contributions in the real world are null.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That’s extremely sad and very philosophical. Doesn’t feel like that would really be humorous.

But that would be a very good depiction and a really good drawing idea!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You're right, it's probably a difficulty in seeing how the view could be harmful because thats not how the artist intended the meaning to be carried out. It might be seen as problematic by some, but it seems to be an extremely thin tightrope with no clear answer.

Artistic disagreements are always a hot button.