▲ 380 ▼ GenAI tools ‘could not exist’ if firms are made to pay copyright (www.computerweekly.com) submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 151 comments fedilink hide all child comments GenAI tools ‘could not exist’ if firms are made to pay copyright::undefined
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 2 years ago (3 children) ...which AI fails to do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Here's your works cited for any generative AI: Humanity. “The Entire Publicly Accessible Internet .” The World Wide Web, , 1 Jan. 1983, WWW.org. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago I doubt that covers it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago AI creators, at least the open source ones, are usually pretty open about where they got the training data for their model permalink fedilink source parent [–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago At the very least, every AI should be able to spit out a comprehensive list of all the material it used for training. And it should be capable of removing any specific item and regenerating its algorithm. This is a fundamental requirement of the technology itself to function. What happens if one the training materials has a retraction? Or if the authors admit they used AI to generate it? You need to purge that knowledge to keep the AI healthy and accurate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Here's your works cited for any generative AI: Humanity. “The Entire Publicly Accessible Internet .” The World Wide Web, , 1 Jan. 1983, WWW.org. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago I doubt that covers it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago AI creators, at least the open source ones, are usually pretty open about where they got the training data for their model permalink fedilink source parent
[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago At the very least, every AI should be able to spit out a comprehensive list of all the material it used for training. And it should be capable of removing any specific item and regenerating its algorithm. This is a fundamental requirement of the technology itself to function. What happens if one the training materials has a retraction? Or if the authors admit they used AI to generate it? You need to purge that knowledge to keep the AI healthy and accurate. permalink fedilink source parent