this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
391 points (91.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35779 readers
1120 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In the last 5 to 10 years everything seems to suck: product's and services quality plummeted, everything from homes to cars to food became really expensive, technology stopped to help us to be something designed to f@ck with us and our money, nobody seems to be able to hold a job anymore, everyone is broke. Life seems worse in general.

Why? Did COVID made this happen? How?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (6 children)

It's not "Capitalism", it's governments not doing their job in regulating capitalist practices, and instead embracing neoliberal economics. I don't accept that all ownership is theft. Trade in goods and services benefits both parties. I am so sick of people using this shorthand word "capitalism" to describe what's going on here. We've had capitalism for millennia, and it's brought us longer, healthier and happier lives, and reduced warfare. It's Thatcherite/Reaganomic practices by governments that are the problem, not the system of ownership of capital.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

At the core, the issue is still deeply rooted within capitalism but governments should absolutely be doing their fucking jobs and curb the worst aspects of it a little until we're ready for something better.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fair point, I accept that. A bit like how democracy is the worst form of government apart from those other ones we tried.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Even then, there are still countless forms of democracy and democratic government. Democracy itself is a cool concept, the actual systems utilizing Democracy vary wildly, from the Soviet form, to the Chinese form, to the American form, to the European forms, to the forms practiced in more Anarchist societies like the EZLN and revolutionary Catalonia, and more.

There's direct Democracy, council Democracy, republican Democracy, proportional Democracy, parliamentary democracy, and far, far more.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Liberal Democracies are of, by, and for the bourgeoisie. Because Capitalists have immense influence, the state will bend to their will.

Trade is good. Capitalism is not. Capitalism is not trade, its a Mode of Production by which there are individual Capitalists and non-owner workers. We have not had Capitalism for millenia, but a few hundred years.

Capitalism did not bring us healthier, longer, and happier lives, nor reduce warfare. Development did. Capitalism drives profit, that's it, anything else is tangential to that end.

I think you would do yourself a lot of good by reading theory.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I agree with your last point - and I may be a bit bourgeois (not to mention ignorant) myself. I'd appreciate recommendations if you wouldn't mind.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

That's a ton of reflection and openness, so I just want to commend you for that. Fantastic to hear and see.

Initially, I want to give a general basis for what can be considered bourgeois. The Bourgeoisie are those Capitalists who do not need to perform labor to survive, and earn their money via ownership alone. One can be a business owner actively and a member of the bourgeoisie if they can simply hire someone to manage in their place, but a member of the petite bourgeoisie cannot hire a manager to take their place and still make enough money to survive.

As for general reading recommendations? You have a lot of paths you can go. I don't personally recommend going full ML or full Anarchist right off the bat, usually it takes a lot of reflection to pick a tendency. I myself don't even have a tendency I identify with, as I believe the process towards progress is unique for each country and state.

If you want a real quick intro: Principles of Communism, by Engels, is an extremely quick read. Why Socialism? by Albert Einstein is another fantastic paper. The Communist Manifesto is good, but it's extremely fiery and usually is better after you're familiar with Marxism.

If you want to get a quick intro that breaks more into the theory side (as in, you'll be more well-read than the vast majority of online leftists with little effort), read both Value, Price, and Profit and Wage Labor and Capital by Marx. They are condensed and simplified versions of what Marx greatly elaborates on in Capital, his seminal masterwork.

For Anarchism, An Anarchist FAQ is a good starting point. Note that Anarchists usually align with Marxists on analysis, but not on strategy.

There's also topics like Syndicalism, Market Socialism, the idea of Reform vs Revolution (Rosa Luxembourg has a good paper on that), and more, but those are fantastic bang for buck reads.

If you still want more, you can always read Socialism: Utopian and Scientific and The Conquest of Bread, the former for Marxism and the latter for Anarchism.

Hope this helps! There are tons of YouTube videos as well that simplify Marxism as much as possible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Capitalism is not millennia old. Capitalism (as commonly defined) only stared to take root after the black death (1350ish) flipped feudalism on its head. Suddenly the free and unfree peasant class had some control of their own destiny and could sell their skills to whomever they wanted at whatever price they could get. Serfs could declare themselves free. Land was often up for grabs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's not "Capitalism", it's governments not doing their job in regulating capitalist practices

It's Thatcherite/Reaganomic practices by governments that are the problem

Hmm, I'm trying to remember what economic system both these countries have... Let's call it "Bappitalism". And if the economic model is so powerful that it influences the governmental one (lobbyists, military spending, etc), then yes, that is a problem.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Read the other comments please.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

That's not how forums or discussions in general work. For reference, read other comments on the internet, please.