180
Could we please refrain from doing exactly what nearly got programming.dev defederated?
(lemmy.blahaj.zone)
People don't stop being trans because you disagree with them politically. I despise Jenner and other high profile trans grifters but I'm not shitty enough to deny their identities.
Do better. As a user of both sites this shit is genuinely upsetting. Despite how you may feel about hexbear, how can you claim that they bait people into revealing their internalized transphobia and then turn around and make shitty claims like this? I don't give a shit if you call me a tankie or red fash or whatever, but I'm trans whether you like me or not.
I have no skin in the game, lemmy.ml is federated with both blahaj.zone and hexbear, plus I'm cis. However, I do think it's worth looking at the situation as a whole:
A member of blahaj.zone is insinuating that the majority of self-proclaimed trans individuals on Hexbear are cis troll accounts attempting to be hostile and confrontational.
Personally, I am in the camp that thinks that this is at best ignorant, as there's no proof I've seen of this, and at worst transphobic. Again, it's worth noting though that I myself am cis and as such I will not pretend to speak for the experience of trans people.
Overall, I do think it's reasonable to ask people not to assume someone claiming to be trans isn't trans merely on the grounds that they are unpleasant to interact with or even actively confrontational. The mere fact that they are acting confrontational should be enough to disengage, but their identity shouldn't be also called into question.
From a trans person, you put this perfectly, thank you.
No, thank you! I try my best, but it's nice to get approval from trans individuals as well, especially because I'm still learning how best to support trans individuals.
The user claimed "40%" as the likely "true" number of trans users. 60% is definitely a majority. I believe it's 100% possible that there could be "false-trans trolls," though I also believe that doubting someone's trans identity on the grounds of being unpleasant or confrontational is transphobic and identity erasure. People's self-procclaimed identity is the only identity that matters, if you have to judge everyone on whether or not you're a "true-trans" that gets into transvestigation territory, only in the opposite direction. It's harmful to actual trans individuals, a sort of "guilty until proven innocent" rhetoric that I personally don't agree with. Again, I myself am cis, so the actual lived experiences of trans individuals, and thus their perspectives and views, may be completely different.
I do disagree about horseshoe theory. People being far-left vs far-right are similar only in that they passionately believe in radical politics. The actual views, however, are staunchly different. Leftism is fundamentally anti-hierarchy, anti-imperialism, and anti-capitalist, whereas rightism supports and upholds hierarchy, Imperialism, and Capitalism. These are extremely incompatible and dissimilar ideas, one side rejects racial hierarchy while the other upholds it, one side supports trans liberation while the other demonizes them. Horseshoe theory is nonsense.
Your final point is completely divorced from the topic at hand as well. The claim by the subject of the OP is that people on hexbear "white knight" trans identity and use it as a shield, despite being cis, on the grounds of being confrontational. This is a claim without evidence, just vibes. Regardless of how unpleasant a troll may be, their identity should be respected, even if they are trolls that should or should not be blocked. A trans troll is both trans and a troll, their identity shouldn't be called into question because they happen to be a troll.
I think you are missing my point. It is not their political views that are similar, but how they treat others in relation to their views.
Dehumanisation of opponents, antagonisation, false flags, discrimination, etc are all part of the playbooks for both the extreme left and extreme right. While the extreme right has racism, the extreme left does 'reverse racism' (basically another brand of racism). Same with gender, the extreme rights have misogynists and the extreme left has misandrists.
Remember we're talking about extremist circles here. Obviously in wider society, one side of the whole discrimination issue is a much bigger problem than the other to the point where it's practically disingenuous to compare the two.
This is true, I have no evidence. The only thing I've said is that I can believe it, and the reason I can believe it is that I used to run in alt-right circles in the past and have a friend that used to run in extreme left circles. Their playbooks and tactics are shockingly similar, and dishonest enough to the point where I would not be surprised if there was a contingent on Hexbear pretending to be trans in bad faith. It is entirely consistent with what alt-right trolls would do.
With that said, you are also correct in that we cannot just no-true-scotsman away the fact that there may actually be some trans people involved in these trolls. There is a lot going on for a lot of trans people in communities with little acceptance, and you may have some that are trying to project an image or are in outright denial to themselves, just like how some gay people were when homosexuality was the big taboo. Or heck, they may actually feel the way they say they do, and want to lash out against a society that didn't accept them. I certainly couldn't blame the latter group tbh.
Yea, you've lost me. First, this is beyond the scope of the original convo, so I wouldn't be surprised if these comments got removed for being off-topic. Secondly, you're just wrong on many of these subjects.
"Reverse-racism" does not exist, same with extreme-left misandry, at least to the degree that it is even in the same realm as far-right racism and misogyny. Leftism is founded on ideas such as rejecting racism and misogyny, and you're implying this is taken too far in the opposite direction that it is somehow equivalent to actual ideologies built on racism and misogyny as core values. That's like saying that trans people take their trans liberation too far and are violently anti-cis, that's a made-up problem and trivializes the very real and active threat that transphobes pose on trans individuals in the real world.
Again: you're implying that taking the stance of "racism and misogyny are bad" to the extreme is comparable to "racism and misogyny are good and natural" to the extreme, it's utterly ridiculous and dismissive towards women and people of color who are genuinely struggling against patriarchy and systemic racism.
For the latter paragraphs, I'm not sure we disagree at all. There certainly could be false-trans individuals on hexbear, my point however is that it is nobody's job to judge or investigate this as it creates an atmosphere of transvestigation and "trans purity" testing that is ultimately transphobic.
You did not read what I wrote
I literally said this. To quote myself:
And Islam is founded on ideas of peace. Christianity is founded on ideas of being virtuous and kind to your neighbours, even if you have differences. Feminism is founded on the core concept of equal rights.
Didn't stop people finding ways to bastardise them, often to the point of going completely against the original messages. Jihadists, WBC and TERFs are all things, after all.
I'm not arguing leftism as a whole is taken too far. I'm arguing that there are contingents in every group who take things too far.
Except I have done nothing of the sort. You're taking a wildly different message away from what I wrote. So I'll try to explain again.
Every group, no matter how originally well meaning, eventually has an offshoot that bastardises the original message into an excuse for hatred.
Sometimes they stay a small group of salty little bastards. And sometimes they get big, sometimes big enough to hijack the whole thing. I would argue this happened several times over the centuries with conservatism, when hatred and subjugation became part of the 'traditional values'
I would agree, it is not our job to try and judge who is who.
I did read what you wrote. You painted the far left and the far right as strikingly similar in terms of dogmatism and action, as though antiracist action is just as bad as racist action. That was your entire "reverse-racism" point, that radicals must be evil if they are radical, which is false. Being radically against transphobia is far better than being radically transphobic.
You can claim you weren't trying to claim they are as bad, but you certainly seemed to be painting a picture that radical leftists are just as bad as radical rightists, because radicalism itself is bad in your eyes.
I'll give you an example: if the two stances are "racism bad" and "racism good," being radically in the "racism bad" camp is a good thing.
If that's your takeaway, then you have zero clue what radicalisation looks like. The radical left isn't 'radically against' transphobia, etc. It is just a different kind of hatred. See FDS for an example.
Nah, the radical left is definitely radically against transphobia. The "both sides" narrative is just dismissal of left wing values, generally.
Stop moving the goalposts. The conversation topic is about the extreme ends, I haven't said shit about the general left.
Actually it's pretty clear you aren't arguing in good faith so I'm just gonna stop here.