▲ 1031 ▼ Bernie Sanders calls on Congress to block funding to Israel (www.theguardian.com) submitted 2 years ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world 132 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] winky88@startrek.website 25 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -16 points 2 years ago (3 children) If they have a problem with me doing that, they can nominate someone who represents my interests. Or just insult me, that'll work wonders. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] Lmaydev@programming.dev 26 points 2 years ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -18 points 2 years ago* (4 children) Eh, it's more about choosing to lose slowly vs. choosing to lose quickly. Either way we lose, which is what the lesser-evil means. At least with Trump winning, people might change their strategy to prevent similar wins in the future. Biden winning means that the lesser-evil is still in style and we have no reason to address the root of society's problems. I'm sorry you need to resort to personal insults, but that just tells me you're not confident about your point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pedalmore@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wen you elect fascists they don't always allow free and fair elections in the future so this "similar wins int he future" clause is ignorant. Especially when the fascist in question already attempted one coup to stay in power when he lost an election. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago voting for a fascist is voting against future elections... just giving power to those who must never, ever, have it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] frezik@midwest.social 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Accelerationism like that does not work. It makes things worse for everyone and nothing improves in the end. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -15 points 2 years ago Sure bud. permalink fedilink source parent [–] eksb@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago* (2 children) If a third of registered Democrats stopped voting for DNC-backed candidates who do not represent them (by not voting or by voting for the Green Party candidate) and the Democrats lost in a landslide, the DNC would have two options: move left to regain the voters move right to keep the corporate bribes coming and try to sway Republican voters. I am not at all confident that they would select option 1. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 point 2 years ago Except that if Trump wins there wont be any voters to win since we won't have elections anymore. What part about a dictatorship do you people not understand? permalink fedilink source parent [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -11 points 2 years ago* (1 child) and try to sway Republican voters. Are you serious? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not everyone is staunchly one party or the other. The people in the middle are the main target for campaigning. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You must not have been paying attention to politics for the last 20 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That's just how it's portrayed in the media. Plenty of people will always vote one way ofc. But just as many people swing based on how well the current government is doing. They are the voters you need to get on side. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uhh, no. That's how most voters actually behave now. Even if the government is doing better under opposition, they will pivot and move goalposts to justify voting for whichever tribe they've been voting for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago You're spending too much time on social media mate. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Lmaydev@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) Why? Do you often base your voting intentions on whether people are mean to you on the internet? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -11 points 2 years ago (2 children) If they have a problem with me doing that, they can nominate someone who represents my interests. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago You get two choices, mostly shit and complete shit. That's how the system works in the US. Most people have figured this out by the time they reach voting age. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 0 points 2 years ago Somebody doesn't understand basic game theory. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're not about to change your mind anyway, so why not have some fun calling you out for what you are? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago It's rude and against the rules to resort to personal insults. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] chitak166@lemmy.world -16 points 2 years ago (3 children) If they have a problem with me doing that, they can nominate someone who represents my interests. Or just insult me, that'll work wonders. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] Lmaydev@programming.dev 26 points 2 years ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -18 points 2 years ago* (4 children) Eh, it's more about choosing to lose slowly vs. choosing to lose quickly. Either way we lose, which is what the lesser-evil means. At least with Trump winning, people might change their strategy to prevent similar wins in the future. Biden winning means that the lesser-evil is still in style and we have no reason to address the root of society's problems. I'm sorry you need to resort to personal insults, but that just tells me you're not confident about your point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pedalmore@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wen you elect fascists they don't always allow free and fair elections in the future so this "similar wins int he future" clause is ignorant. Especially when the fascist in question already attempted one coup to stay in power when he lost an election. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago voting for a fascist is voting against future elections... just giving power to those who must never, ever, have it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] frezik@midwest.social 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Accelerationism like that does not work. It makes things worse for everyone and nothing improves in the end. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -15 points 2 years ago Sure bud. permalink fedilink source parent [–] eksb@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago* (2 children) If a third of registered Democrats stopped voting for DNC-backed candidates who do not represent them (by not voting or by voting for the Green Party candidate) and the Democrats lost in a landslide, the DNC would have two options: move left to regain the voters move right to keep the corporate bribes coming and try to sway Republican voters. I am not at all confident that they would select option 1. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 point 2 years ago Except that if Trump wins there wont be any voters to win since we won't have elections anymore. What part about a dictatorship do you people not understand? permalink fedilink source parent [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -11 points 2 years ago* (1 child) and try to sway Republican voters. Are you serious? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not everyone is staunchly one party or the other. The people in the middle are the main target for campaigning. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You must not have been paying attention to politics for the last 20 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That's just how it's portrayed in the media. Plenty of people will always vote one way ofc. But just as many people swing based on how well the current government is doing. They are the voters you need to get on side. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uhh, no. That's how most voters actually behave now. Even if the government is doing better under opposition, they will pivot and move goalposts to justify voting for whichever tribe they've been voting for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago You're spending too much time on social media mate. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Lmaydev@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) Why? Do you often base your voting intentions on whether people are mean to you on the internet? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -11 points 2 years ago (2 children) If they have a problem with me doing that, they can nominate someone who represents my interests. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago You get two choices, mostly shit and complete shit. That's how the system works in the US. Most people have figured this out by the time they reach voting age. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 0 points 2 years ago Somebody doesn't understand basic game theory. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're not about to change your mind anyway, so why not have some fun calling you out for what you are? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago It's rude and against the rules to resort to personal insults. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Lmaydev@programming.dev 26 points 2 years ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -18 points 2 years ago* (4 children) Eh, it's more about choosing to lose slowly vs. choosing to lose quickly. Either way we lose, which is what the lesser-evil means. At least with Trump winning, people might change their strategy to prevent similar wins in the future. Biden winning means that the lesser-evil is still in style and we have no reason to address the root of society's problems. I'm sorry you need to resort to personal insults, but that just tells me you're not confident about your point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pedalmore@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wen you elect fascists they don't always allow free and fair elections in the future so this "similar wins int he future" clause is ignorant. Especially when the fascist in question already attempted one coup to stay in power when he lost an election. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago voting for a fascist is voting against future elections... just giving power to those who must never, ever, have it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] frezik@midwest.social 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Accelerationism like that does not work. It makes things worse for everyone and nothing improves in the end. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -15 points 2 years ago Sure bud. permalink fedilink source parent [–] eksb@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago* (2 children) If a third of registered Democrats stopped voting for DNC-backed candidates who do not represent them (by not voting or by voting for the Green Party candidate) and the Democrats lost in a landslide, the DNC would have two options: move left to regain the voters move right to keep the corporate bribes coming and try to sway Republican voters. I am not at all confident that they would select option 1. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 point 2 years ago Except that if Trump wins there wont be any voters to win since we won't have elections anymore. What part about a dictatorship do you people not understand? permalink fedilink source parent [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -11 points 2 years ago* (1 child) and try to sway Republican voters. Are you serious? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not everyone is staunchly one party or the other. The people in the middle are the main target for campaigning. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You must not have been paying attention to politics for the last 20 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That's just how it's portrayed in the media. Plenty of people will always vote one way ofc. But just as many people swing based on how well the current government is doing. They are the voters you need to get on side. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uhh, no. That's how most voters actually behave now. Even if the government is doing better under opposition, they will pivot and move goalposts to justify voting for whichever tribe they've been voting for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago You're spending too much time on social media mate. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Lmaydev@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] chitak166@lemmy.world -18 points 2 years ago* (4 children) Eh, it's more about choosing to lose slowly vs. choosing to lose quickly. Either way we lose, which is what the lesser-evil means. At least with Trump winning, people might change their strategy to prevent similar wins in the future. Biden winning means that the lesser-evil is still in style and we have no reason to address the root of society's problems. I'm sorry you need to resort to personal insults, but that just tells me you're not confident about your point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pedalmore@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wen you elect fascists they don't always allow free and fair elections in the future so this "similar wins int he future" clause is ignorant. Especially when the fascist in question already attempted one coup to stay in power when he lost an election. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago voting for a fascist is voting against future elections... just giving power to those who must never, ever, have it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] frezik@midwest.social 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Accelerationism like that does not work. It makes things worse for everyone and nothing improves in the end. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -15 points 2 years ago Sure bud. permalink fedilink source parent [–] eksb@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago* (2 children) If a third of registered Democrats stopped voting for DNC-backed candidates who do not represent them (by not voting or by voting for the Green Party candidate) and the Democrats lost in a landslide, the DNC would have two options: move left to regain the voters move right to keep the corporate bribes coming and try to sway Republican voters. I am not at all confident that they would select option 1. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 point 2 years ago Except that if Trump wins there wont be any voters to win since we won't have elections anymore. What part about a dictatorship do you people not understand? permalink fedilink source parent [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -11 points 2 years ago* (1 child) and try to sway Republican voters. Are you serious? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not everyone is staunchly one party or the other. The people in the middle are the main target for campaigning. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You must not have been paying attention to politics for the last 20 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That's just how it's portrayed in the media. Plenty of people will always vote one way ofc. But just as many people swing based on how well the current government is doing. They are the voters you need to get on side. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uhh, no. That's how most voters actually behave now. Even if the government is doing better under opposition, they will pivot and move goalposts to justify voting for whichever tribe they've been voting for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago You're spending too much time on social media mate. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Lmaydev@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pedalmore@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Wen you elect fascists they don't always allow free and fair elections in the future so this "similar wins int he future" clause is ignorant. Especially when the fascist in question already attempted one coup to stay in power when he lost an election. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago voting for a fascist is voting against future elections... just giving power to those who must never, ever, have it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago voting for a fascist is voting against future elections... just giving power to those who must never, ever, have it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frezik@midwest.social 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) Accelerationism like that does not work. It makes things worse for everyone and nothing improves in the end. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -15 points 2 years ago Sure bud. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eksb@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago* (2 children) If a third of registered Democrats stopped voting for DNC-backed candidates who do not represent them (by not voting or by voting for the Green Party candidate) and the Democrats lost in a landslide, the DNC would have two options: move left to regain the voters move right to keep the corporate bribes coming and try to sway Republican voters. I am not at all confident that they would select option 1. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 point 2 years ago Except that if Trump wins there wont be any voters to win since we won't have elections anymore. What part about a dictatorship do you people not understand? permalink fedilink source parent [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -11 points 2 years ago* (1 child) and try to sway Republican voters. Are you serious? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not everyone is staunchly one party or the other. The people in the middle are the main target for campaigning. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You must not have been paying attention to politics for the last 20 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That's just how it's portrayed in the media. Plenty of people will always vote one way ofc. But just as many people swing based on how well the current government is doing. They are the voters you need to get on side. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uhh, no. That's how most voters actually behave now. Even if the government is doing better under opposition, they will pivot and move goalposts to justify voting for whichever tribe they've been voting for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago You're spending too much time on social media mate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 1 point 2 years ago Except that if Trump wins there wont be any voters to win since we won't have elections anymore. What part about a dictatorship do you people not understand? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] chitak166@lemmy.world -11 points 2 years ago* (1 child) and try to sway Republican voters. Are you serious? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not everyone is staunchly one party or the other. The people in the middle are the main target for campaigning. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You must not have been paying attention to politics for the last 20 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That's just how it's portrayed in the media. Plenty of people will always vote one way ofc. But just as many people swing based on how well the current government is doing. They are the voters you need to get on side. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uhh, no. That's how most voters actually behave now. Even if the government is doing better under opposition, they will pivot and move goalposts to justify voting for whichever tribe they've been voting for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago You're spending too much time on social media mate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Not everyone is staunchly one party or the other. The people in the middle are the main target for campaigning. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You must not have been paying attention to politics for the last 20 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That's just how it's portrayed in the media. Plenty of people will always vote one way ofc. But just as many people swing based on how well the current government is doing. They are the voters you need to get on side. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uhh, no. That's how most voters actually behave now. Even if the government is doing better under opposition, they will pivot and move goalposts to justify voting for whichever tribe they've been voting for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago You're spending too much time on social media mate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chitak166@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) You must not have been paying attention to politics for the last 20 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That's just how it's portrayed in the media. Plenty of people will always vote one way ofc. But just as many people swing based on how well the current government is doing. They are the voters you need to get on side. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uhh, no. That's how most voters actually behave now. Even if the government is doing better under opposition, they will pivot and move goalposts to justify voting for whichever tribe they've been voting for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago You're spending too much time on social media mate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) That's just how it's portrayed in the media. Plenty of people will always vote one way ofc. But just as many people swing based on how well the current government is doing. They are the voters you need to get on side. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uhh, no. That's how most voters actually behave now. Even if the government is doing better under opposition, they will pivot and move goalposts to justify voting for whichever tribe they've been voting for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago You're spending too much time on social media mate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Uhh, no. That's how most voters actually behave now. Even if the government is doing better under opposition, they will pivot and move goalposts to justify voting for whichever tribe they've been voting for. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago You're spending too much time on social media mate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago You're spending too much time on social media mate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) Why? Do you often base your voting intentions on whether people are mean to you on the internet? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] chitak166@lemmy.world -11 points 2 years ago (2 children) If they have a problem with me doing that, they can nominate someone who represents my interests. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago You get two choices, mostly shit and complete shit. That's how the system works in the US. Most people have figured this out by the time they reach voting age. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 0 points 2 years ago Somebody doesn't understand basic game theory. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] chitak166@lemmy.world -11 points 2 years ago (2 children) If they have a problem with me doing that, they can nominate someone who represents my interests. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago You get two choices, mostly shit and complete shit. That's how the system works in the US. Most people have figured this out by the time they reach voting age. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 0 points 2 years ago Somebody doesn't understand basic game theory. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago You get two choices, mostly shit and complete shit. That's how the system works in the US. Most people have figured this out by the time they reach voting age. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 0 points 2 years ago Somebody doesn't understand basic game theory. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) You're not about to change your mind anyway, so why not have some fun calling you out for what you are? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chitak166@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago It's rude and against the rules to resort to personal insults. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chitak166@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago It's rude and against the rules to resort to personal insults. permalink fedilink source parent