For me it’s the notification light you used to find on older phones, was particularly good to know if your phone was charged without picking it up

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yeah but they're all the lower end phones, all the major flagships removed the features three or four versions ago, I don't want to have to sacrifice camera or screen quality in order to have features that should be built into phones by default

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm going to say that today, even on lower-end phones, the screen, processor and camera are all pretty decent.

    I have a Motorola G31, which cost about 200€ one year ago, when I got it. It has a Micro SD Card Slot and a headphone jack. The screen is plenty good (1440p,60hz) (why would you need 120hz or 4k on a phone) And the camera is also quite nice. It has no fancy features, but it takes pictures and that's all I need.

    From my perspective, flagship phones are impractical and overpriced to say the least.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Ive been using 144/165hz monitors for years now and it's jarring going back to 60 hz

    I only spent $290 Cdn after shipping and taxes for my moto g60s. I 100% agree, flagship phones are unnessesary.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Then dont go for the flagship phones?

    What does a $1000 phone do that my $250 phone cant?

    Shit this POS im using can even record at 240 fps

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    That's really that is why I went with the phone I have, out of the phones that I looked at all of them were a downgrade for the screen, and generally camera. Or lacked the tower support in my area since we barely have LTE

  • source
  • parent