▲ 1938 ▼ The dream (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works 237 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) Machine learning? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TheGreenGolem@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Glorified chatbots. Tops. But definitely not something with any kind of intelligence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago* Yesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me. I don't want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Is that not a type of AI already? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, there's an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago So why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion, permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheGreenGolem@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Glorified chatbots. Tops. But definitely not something with any kind of intelligence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago* Yesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me. I don't want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago* Yesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me. I don't want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Is that not a type of AI already? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, there's an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago So why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion, permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, there's an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago So why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion, permalink fedilink source parent
[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago So why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion, permalink fedilink source parent
