▲ 971 ▼ Someone didn't think out the implications. (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] grendel@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago* (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 years ago* You fool! Now she has 1.4 billion, and can buy him for 100 million. This was her plan all along! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 years ago (3 children) This ignores legal realities about property and transferring wealth. When she buys him for 400mil, she will briefly place the money in escrow, reducing them to 700 and 400mil. Then, when he becomes her property, Taylor also gains his assets, reaching 1.5 billion when the escrow is released. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] grendel@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* Yeah no. Her assets: ~1.5b His assets: permalink fedilink source parent [–] jalda@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) but after first purchase her assets go up to 1.5bil and his assets go to .8bil Nope, his assets go to $0, as they belong to her now. What you propose is the economical equivalent of a perpetual motion machine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] grendel@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 2 years ago I mean, you're assuming she's buying him from him, historically speaking there was some violence and a third party involved. permalink fedilink source parent [–] USAONE@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago They did the math permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 years ago* You fool! Now she has 1.4 billion, and can buy him for 100 million. This was her plan all along! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 years ago (3 children) This ignores legal realities about property and transferring wealth. When she buys him for 400mil, she will briefly place the money in escrow, reducing them to 700 and 400mil. Then, when he becomes her property, Taylor also gains his assets, reaching 1.5 billion when the escrow is released. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] grendel@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* Yeah no. Her assets: ~1.5b His assets: permalink fedilink source parent [–] jalda@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) but after first purchase her assets go up to 1.5bil and his assets go to .8bil Nope, his assets go to $0, as they belong to her now. What you propose is the economical equivalent of a perpetual motion machine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] grendel@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 2 years ago I mean, you're assuming she's buying him from him, historically speaking there was some violence and a third party involved. permalink fedilink source parent [–] USAONE@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago They did the math permalink fedilink source parent
[+] grendel@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* Yeah no. Her assets: ~1.5b His assets: permalink fedilink source parent [–] jalda@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) but after first purchase her assets go up to 1.5bil and his assets go to .8bil Nope, his assets go to $0, as they belong to her now. What you propose is the economical equivalent of a perpetual motion machine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] grendel@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* Yeah no. Her assets: ~1.5b His assets: permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jalda@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) but after first purchase her assets go up to 1.5bil and his assets go to .8bil Nope, his assets go to $0, as they belong to her now. What you propose is the economical equivalent of a perpetual motion machine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] grendel@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 2 years ago I mean, you're assuming she's buying him from him, historically speaking there was some violence and a third party involved. permalink fedilink source parent
