▲ 1139 ▼ 41% of fediverse instances have blocked threads so far!!! (tech.lgbt) submitted 2 years ago by vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/technology@lemmy.world 578 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] FlavoredButtHair@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (3 children) What's wrong with threads? I'm out of the loop. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 93 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] FlavoredButtHair@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago Ok yea, fuck Meta and Facebook. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago I think we should pressure public figures and governments to use non-threads profiles. That way if they pull the plug, there's a loss to their own platform. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Pxtl@lemmy.ca -7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) a lot of folks here naively think Meta will for some reason handle things more ethically. Yeah it's way easier to win arguments when you make up your opponent's position in your mind Nobody thinks Meta will be ethical. We just think federation will be good for the Fediverse regardless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Stop. Defending. Zuckerberg. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Start. Learning. To. Read. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Just to be clear, you think (regardless of your rationale) that it's not a problem if threads/meta integrates more into the fediverse, correct? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago If it becomes a problem, the fediverse can cut the bridge when they need to. No sense doing it pre-emptively. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Beelzebob@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago It's owned by meta/facebook permalink fedilink source parent [–] chitak166@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* It's just a mob-mentality. Make your own decisions, which these people clearly don't want you to do. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 93 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] FlavoredButtHair@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago Ok yea, fuck Meta and Facebook. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago I think we should pressure public figures and governments to use non-threads profiles. That way if they pull the plug, there's a loss to their own platform. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Pxtl@lemmy.ca -7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) a lot of folks here naively think Meta will for some reason handle things more ethically. Yeah it's way easier to win arguments when you make up your opponent's position in your mind Nobody thinks Meta will be ethical. We just think federation will be good for the Fediverse regardless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Stop. Defending. Zuckerberg. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Start. Learning. To. Read. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Just to be clear, you think (regardless of your rationale) that it's not a problem if threads/meta integrates more into the fediverse, correct? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago If it becomes a problem, the fediverse can cut the bridge when they need to. No sense doing it pre-emptively. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlavoredButtHair@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago Ok yea, fuck Meta and Facebook. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago I think we should pressure public figures and governments to use non-threads profiles. That way if they pull the plug, there's a loss to their own platform. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Pxtl@lemmy.ca -7 points 2 years ago* (1 child) a lot of folks here naively think Meta will for some reason handle things more ethically. Yeah it's way easier to win arguments when you make up your opponent's position in your mind Nobody thinks Meta will be ethical. We just think federation will be good for the Fediverse regardless. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Stop. Defending. Zuckerberg. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Start. Learning. To. Read. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Just to be clear, you think (regardless of your rationale) that it's not a problem if threads/meta integrates more into the fediverse, correct? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago If it becomes a problem, the fediverse can cut the bridge when they need to. No sense doing it pre-emptively. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Stop. Defending. Zuckerberg. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Start. Learning. To. Read. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Just to be clear, you think (regardless of your rationale) that it's not a problem if threads/meta integrates more into the fediverse, correct? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago If it becomes a problem, the fediverse can cut the bridge when they need to. No sense doing it pre-emptively. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Start. Learning. To. Read. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Just to be clear, you think (regardless of your rationale) that it's not a problem if threads/meta integrates more into the fediverse, correct? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago If it becomes a problem, the fediverse can cut the bridge when they need to. No sense doing it pre-emptively. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) Just to be clear, you think (regardless of your rationale) that it's not a problem if threads/meta integrates more into the fediverse, correct? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago If it becomes a problem, the fediverse can cut the bridge when they need to. No sense doing it pre-emptively. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago If it becomes a problem, the fediverse can cut the bridge when they need to. No sense doing it pre-emptively. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Beelzebob@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago It's owned by meta/facebook permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* It's just a mob-mentality. Make your own decisions, which these people clearly don't want you to do. permalink fedilink source parent