you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

I largely agree with that idea. It feels like at some point Trek will need to let go of all old characters, to ensure its long-term viability. Personally, I'd be happy to get to know a new group (crew) of characters, even if they're not a famous character's offspring. I guess that was the idea with Discovery, but the universe/story arcs that they created didn't interest me too much.

I know that's not really how shows work, people get enamored with the cast and roles, but I'd love to see a semi-regular shift in crew or ship, while the writers tackle the issues of the day allegorically.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    You know, I really tried to like Discovery, but then they tried to be a prequel and a sequel and I just couldn’t do it.

    Another Spock sibling we’ve never heard of? 🙄

    Strange New Worlds is great, I’d just really like them to stop relying on the nostalgia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago

    Yep, I think so, too. I suppose it's just reflective of the time that it's made in; so much of film and TV (and games) is just re-boots, pre/sequels, remasters and remakes. It's like it's too big a risk, to try an stray too far from a perceived existing audience.

    The point I dwell on for longer is the need for humour to be so prevalent in what is essentially a drama series. I keep repeating this in various threads, but I don't like how often it's used and how weak it is. I guess I'd rather watch something that's Hornblower, rather than Family Guy.

  • source
  • parent