you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -36 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I would argue that that point is weak and of dubious merit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I would argue you're just picky.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Okay. I don't see how that refutes any of my prior statements. Promoting junk science and then defending junk science as the only way to get people interested in STEM is a flimsy debate tactic.

    If you like the show you like the show. I'm not here to poo poo people's taste in programming. But promoting it as culturally important and "it gets kids into STEM!" is disingenuous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment