▲ 1508 ▼ If we're reviving everything then start with Mythbusters (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/tumblr@lemmy.world 161 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com -36 points 2 years ago (4 children) I would argue that that point is weak and of dubious merit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 years ago (2 children) I would argue you're just picky. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Okay. I don't see how that refutes any of my prior statements. Promoting junk science and then defending junk science as the only way to get people interested in STEM is a flimsy debate tactic. If you like the show you like the show. I'm not here to poo poo people's taste in programming. But promoting it as culturally important and "it gets kids into STEM!" is disingenuous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RelentlessArts@feddit.uk 7 points 2 years ago But it is culturally important due to how many people watched it and reference it and it did get kids into STEM, just because it is flawed in other ways do not discount those two facts. permalink fedilink source parent [–] chitak166@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* I would argue you're not worth arguing with. Just watching you reply to every comment in this thread is cringe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 years ago (2 children) I would argue you're just picky. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Okay. I don't see how that refutes any of my prior statements. Promoting junk science and then defending junk science as the only way to get people interested in STEM is a flimsy debate tactic. If you like the show you like the show. I'm not here to poo poo people's taste in programming. But promoting it as culturally important and "it gets kids into STEM!" is disingenuous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RelentlessArts@feddit.uk 7 points 2 years ago But it is culturally important due to how many people watched it and reference it and it did get kids into STEM, just because it is flawed in other ways do not discount those two facts. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) Okay. I don't see how that refutes any of my prior statements. Promoting junk science and then defending junk science as the only way to get people interested in STEM is a flimsy debate tactic. If you like the show you like the show. I'm not here to poo poo people's taste in programming. But promoting it as culturally important and "it gets kids into STEM!" is disingenuous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RelentlessArts@feddit.uk 7 points 2 years ago But it is culturally important due to how many people watched it and reference it and it did get kids into STEM, just because it is flawed in other ways do not discount those two facts. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RelentlessArts@feddit.uk 7 points 2 years ago But it is culturally important due to how many people watched it and reference it and it did get kids into STEM, just because it is flawed in other ways do not discount those two facts. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* I would argue you're not worth arguing with. Just watching you reply to every comment in this thread is cringe. permalink fedilink source parent