▲ 487 ▼ Threads is officially starting to test ActivityPub integration (www.theverge.com) submitted 2 years ago by Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 260 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] null@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 years ago (12 children) And the frog could just jump out of the pot before he boils. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago Sure, every other time the water has kept getting hotter and hotter like this it ended up boiling but honestly I really trust the corporations here and I think we should just wait it out! They promised they were just going to slowly heat the water up but not bring it to a boil so I don’t see a reason not to trust them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (10 children) Which they do, if you are trying to boil them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago (9 children) Not in the obvious metaphor I was making. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (8 children) I'm pointing out the metaphor is false and your argument might as well permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago (7 children) The metaphor is clear, and your correction has no bearing on my point whatsoever. Go be an annoying pedant somewhere else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (6 children) Your metaphor is on the Wikipedia's list of common misconceptions. No such luck for your argument. Go be an annoying pedant somewhere else. Log off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) Your metaphor is on the Wikipedia's list of common misconceptions. Absolutely doesn't matter in relation to my point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (4 children) I'm saying your point isn't true, you silly person permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) No, you said the common turn of phrase I used is apocryphal. You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) How did you not catch on when I said "and so might be your point" or whatever it was? You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) "You're wrong". Neat contribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I didn't think it was much but thanks. I'm just happy we understand each other now permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago Sure, every other time the water has kept getting hotter and hotter like this it ended up boiling but honestly I really trust the corporations here and I think we should just wait it out! They promised they were just going to slowly heat the water up but not bring it to a boil so I don’t see a reason not to trust them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (10 children) Which they do, if you are trying to boil them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago (9 children) Not in the obvious metaphor I was making. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (8 children) I'm pointing out the metaphor is false and your argument might as well permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago (7 children) The metaphor is clear, and your correction has no bearing on my point whatsoever. Go be an annoying pedant somewhere else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (6 children) Your metaphor is on the Wikipedia's list of common misconceptions. No such luck for your argument. Go be an annoying pedant somewhere else. Log off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) Your metaphor is on the Wikipedia's list of common misconceptions. Absolutely doesn't matter in relation to my point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (4 children) I'm saying your point isn't true, you silly person permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) No, you said the common turn of phrase I used is apocryphal. You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) How did you not catch on when I said "and so might be your point" or whatever it was? You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) "You're wrong". Neat contribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I didn't think it was much but thanks. I'm just happy we understand each other now permalink fedilink source parent
[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago (9 children) Not in the obvious metaphor I was making. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (8 children) I'm pointing out the metaphor is false and your argument might as well permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago (7 children) The metaphor is clear, and your correction has no bearing on my point whatsoever. Go be an annoying pedant somewhere else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (6 children) Your metaphor is on the Wikipedia's list of common misconceptions. No such luck for your argument. Go be an annoying pedant somewhere else. Log off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) Your metaphor is on the Wikipedia's list of common misconceptions. Absolutely doesn't matter in relation to my point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (4 children) I'm saying your point isn't true, you silly person permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) No, you said the common turn of phrase I used is apocryphal. You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) How did you not catch on when I said "and so might be your point" or whatever it was? You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) "You're wrong". Neat contribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I didn't think it was much but thanks. I'm just happy we understand each other now permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (8 children) I'm pointing out the metaphor is false and your argument might as well permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago (7 children) The metaphor is clear, and your correction has no bearing on my point whatsoever. Go be an annoying pedant somewhere else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (6 children) Your metaphor is on the Wikipedia's list of common misconceptions. No such luck for your argument. Go be an annoying pedant somewhere else. Log off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) Your metaphor is on the Wikipedia's list of common misconceptions. Absolutely doesn't matter in relation to my point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (4 children) I'm saying your point isn't true, you silly person permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) No, you said the common turn of phrase I used is apocryphal. You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) How did you not catch on when I said "and so might be your point" or whatever it was? You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) "You're wrong". Neat contribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I didn't think it was much but thanks. I'm just happy we understand each other now permalink fedilink source parent
[–] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago (7 children) The metaphor is clear, and your correction has no bearing on my point whatsoever. Go be an annoying pedant somewhere else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (6 children) Your metaphor is on the Wikipedia's list of common misconceptions. No such luck for your argument. Go be an annoying pedant somewhere else. Log off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) Your metaphor is on the Wikipedia's list of common misconceptions. Absolutely doesn't matter in relation to my point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (4 children) I'm saying your point isn't true, you silly person permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) No, you said the common turn of phrase I used is apocryphal. You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) How did you not catch on when I said "and so might be your point" or whatever it was? You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) "You're wrong". Neat contribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I didn't think it was much but thanks. I'm just happy we understand each other now permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (6 children) Your metaphor is on the Wikipedia's list of common misconceptions. No such luck for your argument. Go be an annoying pedant somewhere else. Log off permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) Your metaphor is on the Wikipedia's list of common misconceptions. Absolutely doesn't matter in relation to my point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (4 children) I'm saying your point isn't true, you silly person permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) No, you said the common turn of phrase I used is apocryphal. You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) How did you not catch on when I said "and so might be your point" or whatever it was? You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) "You're wrong". Neat contribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I didn't think it was much but thanks. I'm just happy we understand each other now permalink fedilink source parent
[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (5 children) Your metaphor is on the Wikipedia's list of common misconceptions. Absolutely doesn't matter in relation to my point permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (4 children) I'm saying your point isn't true, you silly person permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) No, you said the common turn of phrase I used is apocryphal. You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) How did you not catch on when I said "and so might be your point" or whatever it was? You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) "You're wrong". Neat contribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I didn't think it was much but thanks. I'm just happy we understand each other now permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (4 children) I'm saying your point isn't true, you silly person permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) No, you said the common turn of phrase I used is apocryphal. You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) How did you not catch on when I said "and so might be your point" or whatever it was? You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) "You're wrong". Neat contribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I didn't think it was much but thanks. I'm just happy we understand each other now permalink fedilink source parent
[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) No, you said the common turn of phrase I used is apocryphal. You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) How did you not catch on when I said "and so might be your point" or whatever it was? You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) "You're wrong". Neat contribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I didn't think it was much but thanks. I'm just happy we understand each other now permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) How did you not catch on when I said "and so might be your point" or whatever it was? You haven't made any counterpoint that involved my actual point whatsoever. Correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) "You're wrong". Neat contribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I didn't think it was much but thanks. I'm just happy we understand each other now permalink fedilink source parent
[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) "You're wrong". Neat contribution. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I didn't think it was much but thanks. I'm just happy we understand each other now permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago I didn't think it was much but thanks. I'm just happy we understand each other now permalink fedilink source parent