▲ 487 ▼ Threads is officially starting to test ActivityPub integration (www.theverge.com) submitted 2 years ago by Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 260 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] sour@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (11 children) what wrong with facebook rejection permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (10 children) With thinking Facebook sucks? Nothing. With thinking Facebook sucks and Facebook's audience should stay in Facebook while the "fediverse" stays small and exclusive? That it goes against the stated goals of providing decentralized, open social platforms as a replacement for current closed platforms. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (9 children) facebook only has one instance permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (8 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (7 children) does mastodon decentralized only one instance pick one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) mastodon.social already gets criticism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yeah I know plenty of instances limit them making follows approval only. I also saw this line on a person's profile: "if you follow me from mastodon.social I won't approve your requests, migrate to a different instance". I think the main reason is because mastodon.social has a lot of spam (or has had it in the past) though I'm sure that the threads issue and the fact that they want to federate and encourage federation with threads probably isn't going to help. permalink fedilink source parent [+] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) stated goal is providing decentralized and open platforms facebooks instance isn’t decentralized or open is contradiction permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago how is decentralized if have all users on one instance permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (10 children) With thinking Facebook sucks? Nothing. With thinking Facebook sucks and Facebook's audience should stay in Facebook while the "fediverse" stays small and exclusive? That it goes against the stated goals of providing decentralized, open social platforms as a replacement for current closed platforms. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (9 children) facebook only has one instance permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (8 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (7 children) does mastodon decentralized only one instance pick one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) mastodon.social already gets criticism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yeah I know plenty of instances limit them making follows approval only. I also saw this line on a person's profile: "if you follow me from mastodon.social I won't approve your requests, migrate to a different instance". I think the main reason is because mastodon.social has a lot of spam (or has had it in the past) though I'm sure that the threads issue and the fact that they want to federate and encourage federation with threads probably isn't going to help. permalink fedilink source parent [+] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) stated goal is providing decentralized and open platforms facebooks instance isn’t decentralized or open is contradiction permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago how is decentralized if have all users on one instance permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (9 children) facebook only has one instance permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (8 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (7 children) does mastodon decentralized only one instance pick one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) mastodon.social already gets criticism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yeah I know plenty of instances limit them making follows approval only. I also saw this line on a person's profile: "if you follow me from mastodon.social I won't approve your requests, migrate to a different instance". I think the main reason is because mastodon.social has a lot of spam (or has had it in the past) though I'm sure that the threads issue and the fact that they want to federate and encourage federation with threads probably isn't going to help. permalink fedilink source parent [+] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) stated goal is providing decentralized and open platforms facebooks instance isn’t decentralized or open is contradiction permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago how is decentralized if have all users on one instance permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (8 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (7 children) does mastodon decentralized only one instance pick one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) mastodon.social already gets criticism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yeah I know plenty of instances limit them making follows approval only. I also saw this line on a person's profile: "if you follow me from mastodon.social I won't approve your requests, migrate to a different instance". I think the main reason is because mastodon.social has a lot of spam (or has had it in the past) though I'm sure that the threads issue and the fact that they want to federate and encourage federation with threads probably isn't going to help. permalink fedilink source parent [+] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) stated goal is providing decentralized and open platforms facebooks instance isn’t decentralized or open is contradiction permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago how is decentralized if have all users on one instance permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (7 children) does mastodon decentralized only one instance pick one permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) mastodon.social already gets criticism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yeah I know plenty of instances limit them making follows approval only. I also saw this line on a person's profile: "if you follow me from mastodon.social I won't approve your requests, migrate to a different instance". I think the main reason is because mastodon.social has a lot of spam (or has had it in the past) though I'm sure that the threads issue and the fact that they want to federate and encourage federation with threads probably isn't going to help. permalink fedilink source parent [+] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) stated goal is providing decentralized and open platforms facebooks instance isn’t decentralized or open is contradiction permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago how is decentralized if have all users on one instance permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) mastodon.social already gets criticism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yeah I know plenty of instances limit them making follows approval only. I also saw this line on a person's profile: "if you follow me from mastodon.social I won't approve your requests, migrate to a different instance". I think the main reason is because mastodon.social has a lot of spam (or has had it in the past) though I'm sure that the threads issue and the fact that they want to federate and encourage federation with threads probably isn't going to help. permalink fedilink source parent [+] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) stated goal is providing decentralized and open platforms facebooks instance isn’t decentralized or open is contradiction permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago how is decentralized if have all users on one instance permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) mastodon.social already gets criticism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yeah I know plenty of instances limit them making follows approval only. I also saw this line on a person's profile: "if you follow me from mastodon.social I won't approve your requests, migrate to a different instance". I think the main reason is because mastodon.social has a lot of spam (or has had it in the past) though I'm sure that the threads issue and the fact that they want to federate and encourage federation with threads probably isn't going to help. permalink fedilink source parent [+] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) stated goal is providing decentralized and open platforms facebooks instance isn’t decentralized or open is contradiction permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago how is decentralized if have all users on one instance permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Yeah I know plenty of instances limit them making follows approval only. I also saw this line on a person's profile: "if you follow me from mastodon.social I won't approve your requests, migrate to a different instance". I think the main reason is because mastodon.social has a lot of spam (or has had it in the past) though I'm sure that the threads issue and the fact that they want to federate and encourage federation with threads probably isn't going to help. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MudMan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) stated goal is providing decentralized and open platforms facebooks instance isn’t decentralized or open is contradiction permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago how is decentralized if have all users on one instance permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) stated goal is providing decentralized and open platforms facebooks instance isn’t decentralized or open is contradiction permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago how is decentralized if have all users on one instance permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MudMan@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago how is decentralized if have all users on one instance permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sour@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago how is decentralized if have all users on one instance permalink fedilink source parent