guns

guns@hexbear.net

2,733 readers

257 active

63 users here now

“Under no pretext"

Rules (Under review):

1. NO BUYING, SELLING OR TRADING of guns or accessories. Take that to Reddit and /r/GunAccessoriesForSale or Armslist.com
1. Censor all personally identifiable information in posts including serial numbers on firearms.
1. Any post or comment advocating illegal action will be removed and the poster warned. A second infraction will result in a ban.
1. Unironically suggesting the SKS as a usable rifle in the 21st Century when there are things like the AK and AR that cost only a bit more might result in a ban, it depends on how we feel.
1. Discussion of hunting is acceptable but please put "CW: hunting" in post titles. Debating the ethicality of hunting is also fine, but keep it civil and don't derail other people's threads.

founded 6 years ago

moderators

Wake@hexbear.net

Sulvy@hexbear.net

Size comparison between M1 Abrams and T-72 tank (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 years ago by Tervell@hexbear.net to c/guns@hexbear.net

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AnarchoAnarchist@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

Yeah but does the t72 get half a mile to the gallon like the Abrams? Fuel economy is for commies and women.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

It's due to the gas turbine. Soviet T-80 with gas turbine is also shit at fuel economy (and that was why it didn't become a new main tank instead of T-72).

permalink

fedilink

source

parent