▲ 620 ▼ Apple has seemingly found a way to block Android’s new iMessage app (www.theverge.com) submitted 2 years ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world 341 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, lemme edit it. USAian kids permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago (3 children) The correct term for that is American by the way, not USAian. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, I mean I totally get the annoyance of American being overloaded for both US person and of the American continents, but USAian ain't the solution lol that kind of sucks (hard to say, no history to it, etc) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Give me a term less ambiguous than "American" and I might use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) American is pretty unambiguous. What are you getting it mixed up with? No one else uses it. If you hear American, do you have to run through a list of other countries asking them which they are from? Of not, it's unambiguous. You could argue that it shouldn't be the pronoun for a US citizen, but that's a different argument than it being ambiguous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -5 points 2 years ago Whatever adjective makes you feel better: appropriate, apt, fitting, correct, modest, less expansive, less assuming, less imperious, less opulent, less grandiose, less egocentric, less narcissistic permalink fedilink source parent [–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Chile is American permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Chile citizens are called Chileans. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Chileans, Californians, Texans, New Yorkers, Minnesotans, Britich Columbians, Guatemalans.....all Americans permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago The point you’re trying to make is correct on a technical level, not a functional one. Unfortunately we can’t will languages into behaving in ways we think is ideal simply by making pointless assertions in obscure forums. permalink fedilink source parent [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) No thanks. The USA doesn't represent all of North and South America. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I never said it does. I just said it's the correct word. It's not confusing or ambiguous. Only one country uses it. It also does represent multiple states in the americas, hence the name. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) If that's the correct word to you, fine, use it. I won't. Just because one country assumes it can be eponymous with not just one, but two entire continents, doesn't make it right, nor do I have to agree with it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I guess South African should be something else, because there are other states in southern Africa? Language doesn't really care about being "correct" with terms. It cares about being understandable. No one knows what USAian is. Everyone knows what American is. There isn't really any debate anywhere around what to call people from the United States of America, even among other American nations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I guess South African should be something else, because there are other states in southern Africa? You are correct, it should be something else. To agree on what is pretty difficult though. Azania has been suggested, but there are 12 official languages that probably have their own terms. I won't even attempt to guess how many different tribes were brutally merged into one country by imperialists when they drew the borders to call it South Africa. It wouldn't surprise me if they did rename themselves someday. Even India doesn't want to be called India. There's a growing movement for it to be called Bharat. No one knows what USAian is Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". You could have called them anything and I would have known what you were talking about because of the context. The same context you used to guess "USAian" was available to everyone else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago So it was context alone, was it? Using the acronym USA in an adjective referring to something from the USA didn't clue you in at all. Just the context. Without it your reasoning would've completely led you astray and the sentence would've become unquestionably incomprehensible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago (3 children) The correct term for that is American by the way, not USAian. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, I mean I totally get the annoyance of American being overloaded for both US person and of the American continents, but USAian ain't the solution lol that kind of sucks (hard to say, no history to it, etc) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Give me a term less ambiguous than "American" and I might use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) American is pretty unambiguous. What are you getting it mixed up with? No one else uses it. If you hear American, do you have to run through a list of other countries asking them which they are from? Of not, it's unambiguous. You could argue that it shouldn't be the pronoun for a US citizen, but that's a different argument than it being ambiguous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -5 points 2 years ago Whatever adjective makes you feel better: appropriate, apt, fitting, correct, modest, less expansive, less assuming, less imperious, less opulent, less grandiose, less egocentric, less narcissistic permalink fedilink source parent [–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Chile is American permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Chile citizens are called Chileans. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Chileans, Californians, Texans, New Yorkers, Minnesotans, Britich Columbians, Guatemalans.....all Americans permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago The point you’re trying to make is correct on a technical level, not a functional one. Unfortunately we can’t will languages into behaving in ways we think is ideal simply by making pointless assertions in obscure forums. permalink fedilink source parent [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) No thanks. The USA doesn't represent all of North and South America. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I never said it does. I just said it's the correct word. It's not confusing or ambiguous. Only one country uses it. It also does represent multiple states in the americas, hence the name. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) If that's the correct word to you, fine, use it. I won't. Just because one country assumes it can be eponymous with not just one, but two entire continents, doesn't make it right, nor do I have to agree with it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I guess South African should be something else, because there are other states in southern Africa? Language doesn't really care about being "correct" with terms. It cares about being understandable. No one knows what USAian is. Everyone knows what American is. There isn't really any debate anywhere around what to call people from the United States of America, even among other American nations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I guess South African should be something else, because there are other states in southern Africa? You are correct, it should be something else. To agree on what is pretty difficult though. Azania has been suggested, but there are 12 official languages that probably have their own terms. I won't even attempt to guess how many different tribes were brutally merged into one country by imperialists when they drew the borders to call it South Africa. It wouldn't surprise me if they did rename themselves someday. Even India doesn't want to be called India. There's a growing movement for it to be called Bharat. No one knows what USAian is Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". You could have called them anything and I would have known what you were talking about because of the context. The same context you used to guess "USAian" was available to everyone else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago So it was context alone, was it? Using the acronym USA in an adjective referring to something from the USA didn't clue you in at all. Just the context. Without it your reasoning would've completely led you astray and the sentence would've become unquestionably incomprehensible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah, I mean I totally get the annoyance of American being overloaded for both US person and of the American continents, but USAian ain't the solution lol that kind of sucks (hard to say, no history to it, etc) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Give me a term less ambiguous than "American" and I might use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) American is pretty unambiguous. What are you getting it mixed up with? No one else uses it. If you hear American, do you have to run through a list of other countries asking them which they are from? Of not, it's unambiguous. You could argue that it shouldn't be the pronoun for a US citizen, but that's a different argument than it being ambiguous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -5 points 2 years ago Whatever adjective makes you feel better: appropriate, apt, fitting, correct, modest, less expansive, less assuming, less imperious, less opulent, less grandiose, less egocentric, less narcissistic permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Give me a term less ambiguous than "American" and I might use it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) American is pretty unambiguous. What are you getting it mixed up with? No one else uses it. If you hear American, do you have to run through a list of other countries asking them which they are from? Of not, it's unambiguous. You could argue that it shouldn't be the pronoun for a US citizen, but that's a different argument than it being ambiguous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -5 points 2 years ago Whatever adjective makes you feel better: appropriate, apt, fitting, correct, modest, less expansive, less assuming, less imperious, less opulent, less grandiose, less egocentric, less narcissistic permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) American is pretty unambiguous. What are you getting it mixed up with? No one else uses it. If you hear American, do you have to run through a list of other countries asking them which they are from? Of not, it's unambiguous. You could argue that it shouldn't be the pronoun for a US citizen, but that's a different argument than it being ambiguous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -5 points 2 years ago Whatever adjective makes you feel better: appropriate, apt, fitting, correct, modest, less expansive, less assuming, less imperious, less opulent, less grandiose, less egocentric, less narcissistic permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -5 points 2 years ago Whatever adjective makes you feel better: appropriate, apt, fitting, correct, modest, less expansive, less assuming, less imperious, less opulent, less grandiose, less egocentric, less narcissistic permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Chile is American permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Chile citizens are called Chileans. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Chileans, Californians, Texans, New Yorkers, Minnesotans, Britich Columbians, Guatemalans.....all Americans permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago The point you’re trying to make is correct on a technical level, not a functional one. Unfortunately we can’t will languages into behaving in ways we think is ideal simply by making pointless assertions in obscure forums. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Chile citizens are called Chileans. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Chileans, Californians, Texans, New Yorkers, Minnesotans, Britich Columbians, Guatemalans.....all Americans permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago The point you’re trying to make is correct on a technical level, not a functional one. Unfortunately we can’t will languages into behaving in ways we think is ideal simply by making pointless assertions in obscure forums. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Chileans, Californians, Texans, New Yorkers, Minnesotans, Britich Columbians, Guatemalans.....all Americans permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago The point you’re trying to make is correct on a technical level, not a functional one. Unfortunately we can’t will languages into behaving in ways we think is ideal simply by making pointless assertions in obscure forums. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago The point you’re trying to make is correct on a technical level, not a functional one. Unfortunately we can’t will languages into behaving in ways we think is ideal simply by making pointless assertions in obscure forums. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) No thanks. The USA doesn't represent all of North and South America. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I never said it does. I just said it's the correct word. It's not confusing or ambiguous. Only one country uses it. It also does represent multiple states in the americas, hence the name. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) If that's the correct word to you, fine, use it. I won't. Just because one country assumes it can be eponymous with not just one, but two entire continents, doesn't make it right, nor do I have to agree with it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I guess South African should be something else, because there are other states in southern Africa? Language doesn't really care about being "correct" with terms. It cares about being understandable. No one knows what USAian is. Everyone knows what American is. There isn't really any debate anywhere around what to call people from the United States of America, even among other American nations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I guess South African should be something else, because there are other states in southern Africa? You are correct, it should be something else. To agree on what is pretty difficult though. Azania has been suggested, but there are 12 official languages that probably have their own terms. I won't even attempt to guess how many different tribes were brutally merged into one country by imperialists when they drew the borders to call it South Africa. It wouldn't surprise me if they did rename themselves someday. Even India doesn't want to be called India. There's a growing movement for it to be called Bharat. No one knows what USAian is Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". You could have called them anything and I would have known what you were talking about because of the context. The same context you used to guess "USAian" was available to everyone else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago So it was context alone, was it? Using the acronym USA in an adjective referring to something from the USA didn't clue you in at all. Just the context. Without it your reasoning would've completely led you astray and the sentence would've become unquestionably incomprehensible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I never said it does. I just said it's the correct word. It's not confusing or ambiguous. Only one country uses it. It also does represent multiple states in the americas, hence the name. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) If that's the correct word to you, fine, use it. I won't. Just because one country assumes it can be eponymous with not just one, but two entire continents, doesn't make it right, nor do I have to agree with it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I guess South African should be something else, because there are other states in southern Africa? Language doesn't really care about being "correct" with terms. It cares about being understandable. No one knows what USAian is. Everyone knows what American is. There isn't really any debate anywhere around what to call people from the United States of America, even among other American nations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I guess South African should be something else, because there are other states in southern Africa? You are correct, it should be something else. To agree on what is pretty difficult though. Azania has been suggested, but there are 12 official languages that probably have their own terms. I won't even attempt to guess how many different tribes were brutally merged into one country by imperialists when they drew the borders to call it South Africa. It wouldn't surprise me if they did rename themselves someday. Even India doesn't want to be called India. There's a growing movement for it to be called Bharat. No one knows what USAian is Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". You could have called them anything and I would have known what you were talking about because of the context. The same context you used to guess "USAian" was available to everyone else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago So it was context alone, was it? Using the acronym USA in an adjective referring to something from the USA didn't clue you in at all. Just the context. Without it your reasoning would've completely led you astray and the sentence would've become unquestionably incomprehensible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) If that's the correct word to you, fine, use it. I won't. Just because one country assumes it can be eponymous with not just one, but two entire continents, doesn't make it right, nor do I have to agree with it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I guess South African should be something else, because there are other states in southern Africa? Language doesn't really care about being "correct" with terms. It cares about being understandable. No one knows what USAian is. Everyone knows what American is. There isn't really any debate anywhere around what to call people from the United States of America, even among other American nations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I guess South African should be something else, because there are other states in southern Africa? You are correct, it should be something else. To agree on what is pretty difficult though. Azania has been suggested, but there are 12 official languages that probably have their own terms. I won't even attempt to guess how many different tribes were brutally merged into one country by imperialists when they drew the borders to call it South Africa. It wouldn't surprise me if they did rename themselves someday. Even India doesn't want to be called India. There's a growing movement for it to be called Bharat. No one knows what USAian is Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". You could have called them anything and I would have known what you were talking about because of the context. The same context you used to guess "USAian" was available to everyone else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago So it was context alone, was it? Using the acronym USA in an adjective referring to something from the USA didn't clue you in at all. Just the context. Without it your reasoning would've completely led you astray and the sentence would've become unquestionably incomprehensible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I guess South African should be something else, because there are other states in southern Africa? Language doesn't really care about being "correct" with terms. It cares about being understandable. No one knows what USAian is. Everyone knows what American is. There isn't really any debate anywhere around what to call people from the United States of America, even among other American nations. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I guess South African should be something else, because there are other states in southern Africa? You are correct, it should be something else. To agree on what is pretty difficult though. Azania has been suggested, but there are 12 official languages that probably have their own terms. I won't even attempt to guess how many different tribes were brutally merged into one country by imperialists when they drew the borders to call it South Africa. It wouldn't surprise me if they did rename themselves someday. Even India doesn't want to be called India. There's a growing movement for it to be called Bharat. No one knows what USAian is Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". You could have called them anything and I would have known what you were talking about because of the context. The same context you used to guess "USAian" was available to everyone else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago So it was context alone, was it? Using the acronym USA in an adjective referring to something from the USA didn't clue you in at all. Just the context. Without it your reasoning would've completely led you astray and the sentence would've become unquestionably incomprehensible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And I guess South African should be something else, because there are other states in southern Africa? You are correct, it should be something else. To agree on what is pretty difficult though. Azania has been suggested, but there are 12 official languages that probably have their own terms. I won't even attempt to guess how many different tribes were brutally merged into one country by imperialists when they drew the borders to call it South Africa. It wouldn't surprise me if they did rename themselves someday. Even India doesn't want to be called India. There's a growing movement for it to be called Bharat. No one knows what USAian is Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". You could have called them anything and I would have known what you were talking about because of the context. The same context you used to guess "USAian" was available to everyone else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago So it was context alone, was it? Using the acronym USA in an adjective referring to something from the USA didn't clue you in at all. Just the context. Without it your reasoning would've completely led you astray and the sentence would've become unquestionably incomprehensible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Funny that, I didn't have to explain to anyone what it is because the immediate reaction by people like you was "that's not how you say 'American' ". You could have called them anything and I would have known what you were talking about because of the context. The same context you used to guess "USAian" was available to everyone else. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago So it was context alone, was it? Using the acronym USA in an adjective referring to something from the USA didn't clue you in at all. Just the context. Without it your reasoning would've completely led you astray and the sentence would've become unquestionably incomprehensible. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago So it was context alone, was it? Using the acronym USA in an adjective referring to something from the USA didn't clue you in at all. Just the context. Without it your reasoning would've completely led you astray and the sentence would've become unquestionably incomprehensible. permalink fedilink source parent