172
China Did A Cringe. (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago* by to c/news@hexbear.net
182 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Link

AI have no rights. Your AI creations are right-less. They belong in the public domain. If not, they are properties of the peoples whose art you stole to make the AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

because you didn't write the code for the algorithm, you didn't make any of the training data pictures, and you didn't do anything that could be considered 'creative' or 'talented' to make it

Did you invent the paint brush?

Real fucking artists that put hours of time, effort, and creativity into their work deserve to have it protective.

Working hard does not have any intrinsic moral value. That is puritanist brainworms. There is no value in suffering.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    you are right. i'm sorry. but the issue still stands that the programs that create the art use other artist's work for their own profit with no credit. these people are having their work just, stolen from them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    They are having their art used in a way they didn't expect. That is a problem in capitalism not a problem of tech.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    agreed, but that doesn't make it any more ethical to partake in it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Is it any less ethical than producing art when your art supplies are tainted by exploitation? When you are living on land stolen through genocide? when your way of life is built on the subjugation of the global south?

    The fact is there is effort and creative input involved in making AI art no matter how miniscule that effort is. This ruling protects that effort and creative input from being used for profit by anyone who pleases. It isn't protecting AI tech. its protecting producers form exploitation and that is all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent