Link

AI have no rights. Your AI creations are right-less. They belong in the public domain. If not, they are properties of the peoples whose art you stole to make the AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

the only correct take here is that copyright and "intellectual property" shouldn't exist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And yet you support being able to patent the output of some stable diffusion prompt made from the work of a hundred other artists

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I support anyone who makes something original retaining the profit from its use regardless of the tools they use in its creation.

    If there were no copyright or intellectual property all the scraped image data and generated images would be equally worthless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments