this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

69 readers
1 users here now

A place for Apple news, rumors, and discussions.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I bought a 16" Pro thinking I would need it and realized I never do anything other than simple photo/video editing, occasional VM usage and browsing the internet. Returned it and used the $1000~ savings to book a vacation to the Caribbean instead.

I had fallen for the future proof fallacy when even than, the savings could have been used to buy another new MacBook Air in 3-4 years which would be newer than whatever 'future proofing' I can do now. I would rather buy a new and updated MacBook Air every 4 years with the savings than budget for a Pro model every 7-9 years.

I noticed no difference between using the Pro and Air at all, at least not worth $1000. This sub convinced me that the Air is what 99% of the population would need and is very powerful as is!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Issue is people over exaggerating the Mac's life span. MacBooks last an easy decade and that has been the case for years. Most people use them as a browsing tool and for those it will last a life time being honest.