this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
105 points (99.1% liked)

GenZedong

4288 readers
47 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Um, I am not sure how I feel about this. Why would Xi support a two-state solution? Isn't it more justified to have a one-state solution and return all of the land to the Palestinians? Won't a two-state solution eventually lead us back to another genocide? This feels off. I did not expect Xi to make such a statement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

China (and therefore Xi) follow a policy of territorial integrity (borders should stay as they are [civil wars notwithstanding]), AFAIK Xi wants the 1968 borders to be restored which follows this policy

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I appreciate your response. Restoring 1968 borders still doesn't feel just, in my opinion, considering this gives Israel the majority of the land. At least 50/50 would be more acceptable to me, or even swap lands so that Palestine has the majority as they deserve, but I don't know if that would logistically make sense.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

Hamas actually agreed to the 1968 agreement.In fact, this is the only promising solution at present.