231
Google Chrome will limit ad blockers starting June 2024 (arstechnica.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@beehaw.org
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The "Manifest V3" rollout is back after letting tensions cool for a year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30 points 2 years ago* (7 children)

Firefox is just the only decent option. And while at it, use Piped or Invidious while you still can, people!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    I tried using Invidious, but found that it misses quite a lot of new posts in my subscriptions. So in the end I ahem flew to Ukraine to take advantage of family Premium for around £3 a month.

    Because honestly, I have no real problem paying for Premium, but I massively object to paying £20 A MONTH to watch (mostly) amateur content that YouTube aren’t actually paying anyone to commission. How is Disney+ almost half the damn cost of a YT Premium family plan? Because Google are money-grubbing cunts, that’s how.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Mine has been working fine, but the instance did lose all my "Mark as watched" videos, and for some reason one specific channel never makes into the Subscriptions panel, but I just have it as a favourite and it ends up almost the same. The instance I was using for Piped is now borked, so I'm hanging onto Invidious for now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I'd recommend archiving all of the channels you can from Youtube, it's clear they don't want our traffic at all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I mean, yeah. They absolutely don't want to be spending bandwidth on those of us who use adblockers. What I don't think a lot of people realize is that Google is perfectly happy with the people who are essentially never served an ad not using the service anymore. Saves them money.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Everything you said is correct. But the infuriating part is that YouTube reached that position by killing off its competition. YouTube wouldn't be the only one standing now if they had shown the same behavior 10 years ago. Even more infuriating is that there are a lot of people around who support this entitlement from Google - because you know, you're stealing from the creators! All creators should find a way to accept donations without feeding the abusive corporation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent