JohnDClay comments on UN criticises 'severe' Just Stop Oil sentences

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I guess it depends on the level of disruption. Standing in the street is a little different from dismantling a bridge for example.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

But if you can dismantle a bridge without hurting anyone, and do so in protest of something, that’d be impressive and should be allowed.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I agree it'd be impressive. But is making thousands of people drive more hours every day due to increased congestion hurting them? In the US, most people wouldn't have another option than to just sit in traffic much longer.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I think making people rethink what they "don't have another option" for would be a great reason to disruptively protest something. Like in protest of cars, a bunch of people block the roads only allowing public transit through. Do that long enough, maybe you can people to realize nearly all shortcomings of public transit are caused by underfunding, which is caused by all the money going to car infrastructure.

But of course looking at that from a different perspective would fucking suck, if you're a single parent, working 3 low-wage jobs, and you just want to get to work so you can afford to feed your child next week.... and then some idiots are impeding you getting to work.

But on the other other hand, maybe if the idiots were successful, you'd be able to get to work without owning a car, and you'd be able to work less, not having to pay for a car, gas, insurance, and maintenance. Ultimately improving your life... but only if they're successful. And in the meantime...

/shrug

permalink

fedilink

source

parent