470
The WHO is about to declare aspartame can cause cancer (www.vox.com)
submitted 3 years ago* by to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
182 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 55 points 3 years ago (17 children)

I don't think you can put "the" before WHO unless Roger Daltrey approves it.

I worry about a lot of the additives used today. Some products will say "no sugar added" but will include some artificial sweetener that you only see in the fine print.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I worry about the "natural" sugar alternatives. We all know that aspartame is safe, it's been researched about as extensively as it can be. It only starts to be a concern when you're drinking 2 dozen diets sodas daily.

    But people give "natural" a pass for some reason.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (14 children)

    Which is no sugar. So wheres the Problem?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    I don't like it when my tea is sweet :(

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    So then buy unsweetened tea. We already have a term for things that aren't sweet.

    https://www.amazon.com/Pure-Leaf-Unsweetened-Brewed-Calories/dp/B015Z6WJDY/

    I seriously don't understand why you want the "no sugar added" label to have factually incorrect requirements.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Them’s fighin’ words

    -the entire state of NC

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    No sugar added should mean no sweeteners added, but that's not the case unfortunately.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 24 points 3 years ago

    No sugar added usually just means it's full of sugar originally found in the product. A "no sugar added" apple juice will still have an insanely unhealthy amount of sugar.

    I don't know why you think it should mean no sweeteners. (most) sweeteners are categorically not sugar. If you want something not sweet, the label you're looking for is "unsweetened".

    Besides, sugar is much worse for you than any artificial sweetener.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    "Unsweetened" means no sweeteners added. "No sugar added" means no sugars, but maybe other sweeteners.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    "Unsweetened" is a subclass of "no sugar added" though, and so if you're really looking for "unsweetened", you still have to read the labels of all of the "no sugar added" products that chose that (more generic) label over the (more specific) "unsweetened" label.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Unsweetened is a subclass of "zero/no sugar". No sugar added is a completely separate thing.

    No sugar added does not mean the product doesn't contain sugar or that it's not sweet. It only means there was no extra sugar added during the preparation. A "no sugar added" fruit juice, jam or even ketchup is still going to be sweet.

    Something like pure maple suryp qualifies as no sugar added despite being 99% sugar.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago

    I see what you're saying. I think I said this in another comment, but my goal is just to avoid (overly-)sweet foods. From that standpoint, "unsweetened" is ideal. But "no sugar added" for something that's naturally somewhat sweet (such as tomato paste) is also acceptable. If I were to pick up tomato paste that said "no sugar added" but did have artificial sweeteners, I'd be horrified. So I guess the terminology is more straightforward if you're avoiding sugar, but it's less useful if you're avoiding sweetness.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent