▲ 1 ▼ I only have a 1 gigabit connection and my router is 1 gigabit. How does this happen? (alien.top) submitted 2 years ago by Macaroon-Upstairs@alien.top [B] to c/homenetworking@selfhosted.forum 138 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] cpotteri@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (6 children) 1 Gbps is computationally 1.24416. permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] uncamped@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) This is it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sky-yie@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago With 1 Gbps, most ISPs and router manufacturers mean 1000 Megabits per second. And this site also shows the speed in bits per second. So, the speed shouldn't really be more than 1000 Mbps or 1 Gbps because their hardware isn't capable of that, even if their ISP is providing some extra speed (which sometimes they do, especially with servers like Netflix). This is the typical wrong speed reported by Fast.com and that's why people shouldn't use it to measure how fast their connection is, unless they are trying to verify if their connection sucks with Netflix servers and/or video streaming. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ThreeLeggedChimp@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago Except you know overhead is a thing permalink fedilink source parent [–] Dannyps@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Care to explain? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NewPointOfView@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think they’re getting at the difference between using powers of 10 vs powers of 2. So 1 kb (kilobyte) = 10^3 = 1,000 bytes, but since computers tend to use powers of 2, sometimes they might use 1 kb (kibibyte) = 2^10 = 1024 bytes Strictly speaking, kilo always means 10^3, and kibi always means 2^10 so they’re not equal. But in common parlance, the difference barely matters so it is common to use kilo- even when kibi- is strictly correct. The same holds true for bigger prefixes like giga (10^9) and gibi (2^30). So I think that guy was getting at those differences even though the number he said makes no sense even if you account for the giga/gibi difference. So maybe I wrote all this for no reason lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tand86@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago You are still appreciated. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MooseBoys@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I feel like you’re referring to the 1000 vs 1024 issue, but to get that kind of factor you’d need to be talking on the order of 10^27 bits per second since 2^90 / 10^27 = 1.2379 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tand86@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago Thankyou for being able to do math. Seriously. permalink fedilink source parent [–] miraculum_one@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, it's not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data-rate_units#Gigabit_per_second permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Berzerker7@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago Idk why that comment is getting upvoted so much. Fast.com uses a crude way to determine speed. It’s obviously some flawed math formula since I’ve gotten some wild speeds before (like over 6-7Gbps) on a 2Gbps connection. Whatever it is is obviously inaccurate. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tand86@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago Except its not...and even if you're trying to talk in Gibibytes, its still not. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] uncamped@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) This is it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sky-yie@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago With 1 Gbps, most ISPs and router manufacturers mean 1000 Megabits per second. And this site also shows the speed in bits per second. So, the speed shouldn't really be more than 1000 Mbps or 1 Gbps because their hardware isn't capable of that, even if their ISP is providing some extra speed (which sometimes they do, especially with servers like Netflix). This is the typical wrong speed reported by Fast.com and that's why people shouldn't use it to measure how fast their connection is, unless they are trying to verify if their connection sucks with Netflix servers and/or video streaming. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sky-yie@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago With 1 Gbps, most ISPs and router manufacturers mean 1000 Megabits per second. And this site also shows the speed in bits per second. So, the speed shouldn't really be more than 1000 Mbps or 1 Gbps because their hardware isn't capable of that, even if their ISP is providing some extra speed (which sometimes they do, especially with servers like Netflix). This is the typical wrong speed reported by Fast.com and that's why people shouldn't use it to measure how fast their connection is, unless they are trying to verify if their connection sucks with Netflix servers and/or video streaming. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ThreeLeggedChimp@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago Except you know overhead is a thing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dannyps@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Care to explain? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NewPointOfView@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think they’re getting at the difference between using powers of 10 vs powers of 2. So 1 kb (kilobyte) = 10^3 = 1,000 bytes, but since computers tend to use powers of 2, sometimes they might use 1 kb (kibibyte) = 2^10 = 1024 bytes Strictly speaking, kilo always means 10^3, and kibi always means 2^10 so they’re not equal. But in common parlance, the difference barely matters so it is common to use kilo- even when kibi- is strictly correct. The same holds true for bigger prefixes like giga (10^9) and gibi (2^30). So I think that guy was getting at those differences even though the number he said makes no sense even if you account for the giga/gibi difference. So maybe I wrote all this for no reason lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tand86@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago You are still appreciated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NewPointOfView@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I think they’re getting at the difference between using powers of 10 vs powers of 2. So 1 kb (kilobyte) = 10^3 = 1,000 bytes, but since computers tend to use powers of 2, sometimes they might use 1 kb (kibibyte) = 2^10 = 1024 bytes Strictly speaking, kilo always means 10^3, and kibi always means 2^10 so they’re not equal. But in common parlance, the difference barely matters so it is common to use kilo- even when kibi- is strictly correct. The same holds true for bigger prefixes like giga (10^9) and gibi (2^30). So I think that guy was getting at those differences even though the number he said makes no sense even if you account for the giga/gibi difference. So maybe I wrote all this for no reason lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tand86@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago You are still appreciated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tand86@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago You are still appreciated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MooseBoys@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I feel like you’re referring to the 1000 vs 1024 issue, but to get that kind of factor you’d need to be talking on the order of 10^27 bits per second since 2^90 / 10^27 = 1.2379 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tand86@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago Thankyou for being able to do math. Seriously. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tand86@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago Thankyou for being able to do math. Seriously. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] miraculum_one@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) No, it's not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data-rate_units#Gigabit_per_second permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Berzerker7@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago Idk why that comment is getting upvoted so much. Fast.com uses a crude way to determine speed. It’s obviously some flawed math formula since I’ve gotten some wild speeds before (like over 6-7Gbps) on a 2Gbps connection. Whatever it is is obviously inaccurate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Berzerker7@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago Idk why that comment is getting upvoted so much. Fast.com uses a crude way to determine speed. It’s obviously some flawed math formula since I’ve gotten some wild speeds before (like over 6-7Gbps) on a 2Gbps connection. Whatever it is is obviously inaccurate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tand86@alien.top [B] 1 point 2 years ago Except its not...and even if you're trying to talk in Gibibytes, its still not. permalink fedilink source parent