Self defense? Only on the battlefield? Only to achieve a ‘noble’ end?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

My point is that it's an absurd argument.

Let's talk real world, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Do you think a reasonable argument can be made that those bombings made sense? If not, what about in 1945?

I'm not asking you to agree, just to understand the argument. It's a discussion worth having, even if you disagree with the answer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I don't think it made sense, even at that time. Those cities were mainly built with wood, and US used a lot of fire against Japan.

    The use of nuclear power against Japan was more like a test and a message, it was not needed to win the war. (At least this is what I remember from this documentary )

  • source
  • parent