▲ 515 ▼ 8GB RAM in M3 MacBook Pro Proves the Bottleneck in Real-World Tests (www.macrumors.com) submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 175 comments fedilink hide all child comments 8GB RAM in M3 MacBook Pro Proves the Bottleneck in Real-World Tests::Apple's new MacBook Pro models are powered by cutting-edge M3 Apple silicon, but the base configuration 14-inch model starting at $1,599...
[–] bmsok@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (7 children) HDD in 2023? Why? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 14 points 2 years ago (2 children) Meanwhile my i7 thinkpad with nvme somehow is not compatible with windows 11. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scottywh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Well neither is my surface pro 4 but I don't want 11 and that machine still works great anyway. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago That was the weird thing as well, only my PC was eligible for an upgrade lol. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago Dumb company decisions ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ permalink fedilink source parent [–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago Based on everything else, price. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 3 points 2 years ago I think it's so you can write 1000GB on it and have be cheaper than a 256GB machine. My folks had a 2019 laptop with an HDD, I'm not even being figurative here, they literally could not use it, 10+ minutes to boot it and load a program. Constant 100% I/O usage. Stuck some RAM and and a SATA SSD in it, it's been a daily driver ever since. permalink fedilink source parent [–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago The computers from 1921. As a standard in a corporate environment permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 14 points 2 years ago (2 children) Meanwhile my i7 thinkpad with nvme somehow is not compatible with windows 11. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scottywh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Well neither is my surface pro 4 but I don't want 11 and that machine still works great anyway. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago That was the weird thing as well, only my PC was eligible for an upgrade lol. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Well neither is my surface pro 4 but I don't want 11 and that machine still works great anyway. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago That was the weird thing as well, only my PC was eligible for an upgrade lol. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago Dumb company decisions ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago Based on everything else, price. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 3 points 2 years ago I think it's so you can write 1000GB on it and have be cheaper than a 256GB machine. My folks had a 2019 laptop with an HDD, I'm not even being figurative here, they literally could not use it, 10+ minutes to boot it and load a program. Constant 100% I/O usage. Stuck some RAM and and a SATA SSD in it, it's been a daily driver ever since. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago The computers from 1921. As a standard in a corporate environment permalink fedilink source parent