▲ 36 ▼ American leftists do you vote? Why or why not? And if yes, for who and why? (lemmygrad.ml) submitted 2 years ago by VictimOfAmerikkka@lemmygrad.ml to c/askchapo@hexbear.net 57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) South America is worse under trump too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] aaro@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) Right? Biden is a fucking stinker but he probably wouldn't want a ground war with Mexico permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago yeah and Trump added like 30+ sanctions to Venezuela permalink fedilink source parent [–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago archive is either down rn or the link you sent is broken btw permalink fedilink source parent [–] MattsAlt@hexbear.net 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Thing is though, liberal opposition would be much higher. March on DC may have been twice the size under Trump. Not saying anything balances, but there is that aspect to consider under a Trump presidency too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago* Sort of, yeah, but not really when it comes to stuff about countries that aren't a hot topic. Mexico - the libs might say something because to be pro-mexican is to be anti trump. Maybe there'd be more opposition if Trump was in power on certain issues, but at the same time the 'opposition' they show is usually meaningless and disappears once the Dems get back in power, and pivot to a new voter issue to consolidate power. But in deeper South America, Bolivia, Venezuela, Chile, and so on, libs couldn't care less. They've never cared about what goes on in the periphery. The media will put out a bunch of op-eds about why the next left wing candidate is actually one of the bad guys, and the libs will follow suit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] aaro@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) Right? Biden is a fucking stinker but he probably wouldn't want a ground war with Mexico permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago yeah and Trump added like 30+ sanctions to Venezuela permalink fedilink source parent [–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago archive is either down rn or the link you sent is broken btw permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago yeah and Trump added like 30+ sanctions to Venezuela permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago archive is either down rn or the link you sent is broken btw permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MattsAlt@hexbear.net 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Thing is though, liberal opposition would be much higher. March on DC may have been twice the size under Trump. Not saying anything balances, but there is that aspect to consider under a Trump presidency too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago* Sort of, yeah, but not really when it comes to stuff about countries that aren't a hot topic. Mexico - the libs might say something because to be pro-mexican is to be anti trump. Maybe there'd be more opposition if Trump was in power on certain issues, but at the same time the 'opposition' they show is usually meaningless and disappears once the Dems get back in power, and pivot to a new voter issue to consolidate power. But in deeper South America, Bolivia, Venezuela, Chile, and so on, libs couldn't care less. They've never cared about what goes on in the periphery. The media will put out a bunch of op-eds about why the next left wing candidate is actually one of the bad guys, and the libs will follow suit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago* Sort of, yeah, but not really when it comes to stuff about countries that aren't a hot topic. Mexico - the libs might say something because to be pro-mexican is to be anti trump. Maybe there'd be more opposition if Trump was in power on certain issues, but at the same time the 'opposition' they show is usually meaningless and disappears once the Dems get back in power, and pivot to a new voter issue to consolidate power. But in deeper South America, Bolivia, Venezuela, Chile, and so on, libs couldn't care less. They've never cared about what goes on in the periphery. The media will put out a bunch of op-eds about why the next left wing candidate is actually one of the bad guys, and the libs will follow suit. permalink fedilink source parent