Not really sure what to put here...I usually put relevant excerpts, but that got this post deleted for doing that

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)

There's a bit of difference between "exposing animal cruelty" and stealing livestock.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Bit of a fucked up situation when conscious beings are considered property though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    They were stealing sick livestock that had no commercial value.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Still, that's a few steps further than just "exposing animal cruelty".

    Not saying what they did was wrong at all, but the headline is definitely clickbait.

    (Note: I haven't read past the headline or some of the comments, so I might be way off)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Juries didn’t view it as wrong in past court cases. This was the first one to land a conviction, and they did it by putting a gag order on all the footage the activists took, which in previous cases was instrumental in swaying juries.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    houses and cars are inanimate objects.

    Juries acquited these activists of theft in previous cases, because they were shown footage of the awful condition the stolen animals were in. Which was why, in this case, the prosecutors dropped the theft charges, put a gag order on the footage, and instead threw a “felony conspiracy to commit trespassing” charge at the leader of the group, who didn’t even participate directly in stealing the animals.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Sentient beings are not houses or cars. If parents abuse their babies, they will get them taken from them. Same should apply to animals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If parents abuse their babies, they will get them taken from them.

    By the state after a detailed legal process, not some rando off the street after a beer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments