you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 35 points 3 years ago (15 children)

The mental gymnastics are in response to copyright holders' gymnastics. They remove content, relocate it, put it behind tiered subscriptions, or sometimes effectively delete it from all legal avenues after owners/subscribers paid for it. So if paying for a subscription isn't owning it, as described in Amazon's fine print for example, then what do you do? It's a long-term rental subject to removal upon any licensing transfers. Sure, we get greedy once set up, but if legal options don't actually offer you any legal ownership due to legal gymnastics, then yeah, I'll do the mental gymnastics right back at them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    I agree. I'm American and I love the show "Taskmaster." I would like to give them money to watch it. They would like to receive my money. There have been legal complications for years. I've bought their physical board game from their website but as far as the show goes, yo ho ho!

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -20 points 3 years ago (13 children)

    It's their IP, they can distribute it in any way they see fit. It doesn't entitle you to steal it just because you disagree with how it's distributed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    If you really believe that then why are you on a piracy forumn?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    There's nuance in the pirate ranks my dude. Some people don't really believe in property rights at all, some people think that piracy is acceptable when you can't afford/obtain the original, some just like to try before they buy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    Some think it's ok for them to steal but not for them to be stolen from.

    Edit: dont shoot the messenger

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    How can it be stealing if downloading doesn’t take the content away from anyone else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Do you strictly have to deprive others of content to be stealing? Taking away potential revenue, stealing someone's design, etc. are also forms of stealing. If a gaming company lifts some art someone shared and put it in their game without compensating the artist or getting permission, would that not be stealing? They're not taking away that content from anyone else - so is that ok?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Pretty sure that you do have to intend to permanently deprive for it to be theft. What you're describing is copyright infringement. Whether that's morally right is a different question but it's not stealing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I have no idea how you came to this conclusion but it is legally incorrect.

    Property theft is taking anything you do not own without consent of the owner. It has nothing to do with if that property deprived the owner of anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment