277
US Vetoes UN Resolution for Ceasefire in Gaza (consortiumnews.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
104 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

@Luccajan basically the UN is a forum for dialogue and we need the big players to be part of it.

If they don't get veto on the security council they will have a tantrum and leave, which will benefit no one.

The superpowers already flout international law when they really want to, because there is nothing the rest of us can do to stop them, but it would probably be far worse if they weren't even part of the UN.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    basically the UN is a forum for dialogue and we need the big players to be part of it.

    Allowing the five biggest arms manufacturers on the planet to decide "security" issues is no different than allowing the five biggest drug cartels in the world to decide "health" issues.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago*

    @masquenox I agree apart from the bit about allowing. We literally can't physically stop them. They will decide "security" issues whether we want them to or not. That's my point.

    It's not just because of their military might. In the 1980s, France carried out a terror attack in my country which killed two people. We actually caught the terrorists but our "allies" the UK, EU and US told us that unless we let them go (we had wanted to give them a trial and imprisonment) we would no longer be able to trade with those countries and faced economic ruin.

    If we had no government able to withstand them, it would be better to be in dialogue with the cartels than not - and good to have a space where they could dialogue with each other, too.

    Bodies like the UNFP and UNHCR are valuable. Discussion is valuable. Even with the security council it's better that the world at least express what we want, where each other can see it, even if it's inevitably vetoed by US or Russia or China.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent