On the side bar it lists the following:

  • [Matrix/Element]Dead
  • Discord

"Discord" is an active link, but the Matrix link is completely inactive. Not only is it inactive (which could have be excused as a broken link), but it is also manually labeled as "Dead", as if there is no intention of making it work. How can a community that is focused on privacy willingly favor a service that is privacy non-respecting when a perfectly functional privacy-respecting alternative exists?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Matrix is pretty convenient. They've got a great mobile and web app experience.

What exactly does discord have that mateix doesn't? They both have threading, replies, reacts, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago (6 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    But that's cyclic reasoning. Nothing that you need/want will be on matrix if you (and everyone else) does not think it's worth to make what you need/want be in matrix..

    I don't need EVERYTHING to be in Matrix, just the things I'm interested in. So I'm happy when I see a push to have those specific things there. This is the same argument as to why I don't use Reddit anymore, despite Lemmy/Kbin having only a fraction of the content.

    It also helps the fact that Matrix is very flexible when it comes to mirroring/proxying other protocols. I can easily access IRC communities from Matrix, for example. The integration in that direction is nicer than requiring discord channels to add bots that parrot an IRC chat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Yes, but the question is: what does matrix need to establish itself as a solid alternative?

    You can't answer that by saying "people don't use it, change that" because that's something only people can change, not matrix, that'd lead to a cyclic problem.

    Specially when that's given as a counterpoint to justify not wanting to do the change for "this community". It's contradictory to want its popularity to be changed but accept the lack of change alone as a valid reason to justify your communities not changing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    I don't think EVERYONE needs to understand / know about it. I mean, I remember when I was young most people had no idea how to use the internet (hell, they didn't even know how to program a VHS), yet I was perfectly happy using that technology.

    I only need a specific set of people and specific communities to be there for it to be worth it. Like I said: I no longer use reddit, even though the fediverse has only a small fraction of the content existing in reddit... I would have expected people in the fediverse would be more receptive to unpopular but technologically/ethically superior alternatives.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    How and who is addressing this at large scale? I mean uptake of foss vs proprietary, privacy compliant vs not etc... It's the same story for signal vs WhatsApp, when one sees the majority of relatives using WhatsApp, s/he would then drop signal altogether or keep it alongside for the one geek that uses it. I am in this situation and it defeats me that not much people care and chose convenience over concerns that I find legitimately vital, or in any case not trivial. I quit using Facebook/Instagram 2 years ago seeing what it does to society and am better off mentally, but the interactions I have through mastodon and pixelfed are zero, although my meta pages are still up with these links

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Each matrix chat is it's own channel. To admin multiple channels as you would on discord you just have to set up multiple matrix chats held by a common owner.

    There is a mod role but you're right that you can't make custom ones though I honestly don't see much need to for a simple privacy community.

    And I think matrix has voice now.

    But yah I get what you're saying. Thank you for the elaboration.

  • source
  • parent