technology

23277 readers

277 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

NFTs do have a use value (hexbear.net)

submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The reason why NFT artwork is worth millions isn't just for a speculative market so another chump will buy it from you at a higher price, but it also has another value. Like all artwork it is used for tax avoidance. The high price of NFTs allows a wealthy elite to squirrel away millions to accrue value without being taxed. They are more handy than a real piece of artwork or some expensive property in London because a digital image isn't vulnerable to physical damage or maintenance costs. It's obvious why this shit is exploding.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 children)

I see this a lot on the internet but it's only partially true, like it only happens for the 0.1% of collectors who can afford to slosh $80m in wet paintings into freeports every season. The vast majority of collectors just want to sell their work for more then they paid for it 20 years ago. Return expectations are still wildly inflated, but the whole market actually isn't just a laundering scheme, and most "investors" in conventional art break even at best.

Source: I'm the brilliant but sexy art history major in every airport novel you've read

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

Oh for sure, only the 0.01% or higher who can afford this do this. You're right that most investors are doing this because they hope to sell for more than they buy, and will have to pay capital gains tax.