▲ 15 ▼ Would you become a landlord if that meant that you didnt have to work ever again? (hexbear.net) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by ComradeLuz@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net 41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ComradeLuz@hexbear.net [S] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Why no kids? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] plinky@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean i dont have kids, thus not leaving any property/assets behind is not some hard question. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ComradeLuz@hexbear.net [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can donate it to the communist party so they can re-purpose it to something useful for the revolution once you die? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] plinky@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago Taking a broad view on history of unions and communist parties, they more than likely to set small bureaucracy dealing with properties which will survive active party politics by 50 years. And again, being a piggy is warping to the soul, i can't deal with nonpaying tenants. Just flat out, i can't throw people on the street. If i were to rent a property, that situation would come up sooner or later, and then doing moral calculus "well, i'll make someone homeless, but thats okay cause i fund charity communist party" is bullshit permalink fedilink source parent
[–] plinky@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) I mean i dont have kids, thus not leaving any property/assets behind is not some hard question. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ComradeLuz@hexbear.net [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can donate it to the communist party so they can re-purpose it to something useful for the revolution once you die? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] plinky@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago Taking a broad view on history of unions and communist parties, they more than likely to set small bureaucracy dealing with properties which will survive active party politics by 50 years. And again, being a piggy is warping to the soul, i can't deal with nonpaying tenants. Just flat out, i can't throw people on the street. If i were to rent a property, that situation would come up sooner or later, and then doing moral calculus "well, i'll make someone homeless, but thats okay cause i fund charity communist party" is bullshit permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ComradeLuz@hexbear.net [S] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You can donate it to the communist party so they can re-purpose it to something useful for the revolution once you die? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] plinky@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago Taking a broad view on history of unions and communist parties, they more than likely to set small bureaucracy dealing with properties which will survive active party politics by 50 years. And again, being a piggy is warping to the soul, i can't deal with nonpaying tenants. Just flat out, i can't throw people on the street. If i were to rent a property, that situation would come up sooner or later, and then doing moral calculus "well, i'll make someone homeless, but thats okay cause i fund charity communist party" is bullshit permalink fedilink source parent
[–] plinky@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago Taking a broad view on history of unions and communist parties, they more than likely to set small bureaucracy dealing with properties which will survive active party politics by 50 years. And again, being a piggy is warping to the soul, i can't deal with nonpaying tenants. Just flat out, i can't throw people on the street. If i were to rent a property, that situation would come up sooner or later, and then doing moral calculus "well, i'll make someone homeless, but thats okay cause i fund charity communist party" is bullshit permalink fedilink source parent