▲ 268 ▼ Imagine going to the desert for a rave, in an apartheid state, mere miles from an open air concentration camp and not wondering if you are the baddies. (hexbear.net) submitted 3 years ago by Yuritopiaposadism@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net 143 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 82 points 3 years ago (5 children) Pearl Harbor moment permalink fedilink source hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] MattsAlt@hexbear.net 49 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (4 children) Hey it actually is though. Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen to bring the US into a conflict it wanted to be a part of but didn't really have a good reason for. Israel wants to say those mean Palestinians are bloodthirsty animals and treats them as such then acts shocked when people brought to the brink lash out and use that as an excuse for incredible violence with little to no repercussions internationally because "they're just defending themselves" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] culpritus@hexbear.net 26 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 16 points 3 years ago (2 children) idk it seemed like the settlers were actually surprised, if so"allowed to happen" wouldn't fit as nicely. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ProfessorAdonisCnut@hexbear.net 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) So were the troops in Pearl Harbor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 13 points 3 years ago how surprised was the command? they were busy being racist and worried about sabotage from japanese-americans but if peal harbor was "allowed to happen" that implies a bush "could've done something about it but didn't" whereas israel expects liberatory violence regularly but not at this scale or on that day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MattsAlt@hexbear.net 49 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (4 children) Hey it actually is though. Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen to bring the US into a conflict it wanted to be a part of but didn't really have a good reason for. Israel wants to say those mean Palestinians are bloodthirsty animals and treats them as such then acts shocked when people brought to the brink lash out and use that as an excuse for incredible violence with little to no repercussions internationally because "they're just defending themselves" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] culpritus@hexbear.net 26 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 16 points 3 years ago (2 children) idk it seemed like the settlers were actually surprised, if so"allowed to happen" wouldn't fit as nicely. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ProfessorAdonisCnut@hexbear.net 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) So were the troops in Pearl Harbor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 13 points 3 years ago how surprised was the command? they were busy being racist and worried about sabotage from japanese-americans but if peal harbor was "allowed to happen" that implies a bush "could've done something about it but didn't" whereas israel expects liberatory violence regularly but not at this scale or on that day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 16 points 3 years ago (2 children) idk it seemed like the settlers were actually surprised, if so"allowed to happen" wouldn't fit as nicely. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ProfessorAdonisCnut@hexbear.net 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) So were the troops in Pearl Harbor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 13 points 3 years ago how surprised was the command? they were busy being racist and worried about sabotage from japanese-americans but if peal harbor was "allowed to happen" that implies a bush "could've done something about it but didn't" whereas israel expects liberatory violence regularly but not at this scale or on that day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ProfessorAdonisCnut@hexbear.net 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) So were the troops in Pearl Harbor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 13 points 3 years ago how surprised was the command? they were busy being racist and worried about sabotage from japanese-americans but if peal harbor was "allowed to happen" that implies a bush "could've done something about it but didn't" whereas israel expects liberatory violence regularly but not at this scale or on that day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 13 points 3 years ago how surprised was the command? they were busy being racist and worried about sabotage from japanese-americans but if peal harbor was "allowed to happen" that implies a bush "could've done something about it but didn't" whereas israel expects liberatory violence regularly but not at this scale or on that day. permalink fedilink source parent