literally no clue (media.infosec.exchange)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 45 points 2 years ago (5 children)
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    This does not require mass weed killer, pesticides, and water though?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Honestly, that may be better. At least it doesn't use water and it would be fine in a very dry environment out western US.

    Native plants would still be even better though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Looks like an example of xeriscaping, or gardening with a minimal need for irrigation. Not the best I've seen, but at least it's water-conserving.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Is the native landscape a rock garden? If you live in the Mojave: Go nuts, but that black rock is going to bake your house and drive up your carbon dioxide usage. Plants breathe just like animals do and that increases humidity locally, and in dry climates that can be a significant cooling effect. Essentially cheap evaporative cooling.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I feel like this can still be a native lawn depending on which biome it's in. Seems more desert like than a prairie/forest type "native lawn" you might traditionally think of.

    But yeah native can look different depending on location so I might be ok with this

  • source
  • parent